Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, PO Box 5010, Atlanta, GA 30302-5010, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2010 Jun;45(3-4):231-46. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9299-8.
Community narratives are increasingly important as people move towards an ecologically sustainable society. Global climate change is a multi-faceted problem with multiple stakeholders. The voices of affected communities must be heard as we make decisions of global significance. We document the narratives of long-term anti-nuclear activists near the Three Mile Island (TMI) nuclear power plant who speak out in the dawn of a nuclear renaissance/relapse. While nuclear power is marketed as a "green" solution to global warming, their narratives reveal three areas for consideration; (1) significant problems with nuclear technology, (2) lessons "not" learned from the TMI disaster, and (3) hopes for a sustainable future. Nuclear waste, untrustworthy officials and economic issues were among the problems cited. Deceptive shaping of public opinion, nuclear illiteracy, and an aging anti-nuclear movement were reasons cited for the lessons not learned. However, many remain optimistic and envision increased participation to create an ecologically-balanced world.
社区叙事随着人们向生态可持续社会的转变变得越来越重要。全球气候变化是一个多方面的问题，涉及多个利益相关者。在我们做出具有全球意义的决策时，必须倾听受影响社区的声音。我们记录了三哩岛（TMI）核电厂附近长期反核活动家的叙述，他们在核复兴/复发的黎明时分大声疾呼。虽然核电被宣传为应对全球变暖的“绿色”解决方案，但他们的叙述揭示了三个需要考虑的方面; （1）核技术存在重大问题，（2）未从 TMI 灾难中吸取教训，（3）对可持续未来的希望。核废料、不可信的官员和经济问题是被提到的问题之一。被提到的未吸取教训的原因包括对公众舆论的欺骗性塑造、核文盲和老龄化的反核运动。然而，许多人仍然持乐观态度，并设想增加参与度以创造一个生态平衡的世界。
