Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Catholic University of Leuven, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Jul;37(7):525-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02076.x. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate axial forces and bending moments (BMs) on implants supporting a complete arch fixed implant supported prosthesis with respect to number and distribution of the implants and type of prosthesis material. Seven oral Brånemark implants with a diameter of 3.75 mm and a length of 13 and 7 mm (short distal implant) were placed in an edentulous composite mandible used as the experimental model. One all-acrylic, one fibre-reinforced acrylic, and one milled titanium framework prosthesis were made. A 50 N vertical load was applied on the extension 10 mm distal from the most posterior implant. Axial forces and BMs were measured by calculating signals from three strain gauges attached to each of the abutments. The load was measured using three different models with varying numbers of supporting implants (3, 4 and 5), three models with different implant distribution conditions (small, medium and large) and three models with different prosthesis materials (titanium, acrylic and fibre-reinforced acrylic). Maximum BMs were highest when prostheses were supported by three implants compared to four and five implants (P < 0.001). The BMs were significantly influenced by the implant distribution, in that the smallest distribution induced the highest BMs (P < 0.001). Maximum BMs were lowest with the titanium prosthesis (P < 0.01). The resultant forces on implants were significantly associated with the implant number and distribution and the prosthesis material.
本研究旨在评估种植体支持的全弓固定种植义齿修复体的种植体数量和分布以及修复体材料类型对种植体轴向力和弯曲力矩(BMs)的影响。在无牙复合下颌骨的实验模型中,共植入 7 颗直径为 3.75 毫米、长 13 毫米和 7 毫米(短远端种植体)的口腔 Brånemark 种植体。制作了 1 个全丙烯酸树脂、1 个纤维增强丙烯酸树脂和 1 个铣削钛框架修复体。在距离最末一个种植体后 10 毫米的延伸部位施加 50N 的垂直载荷。通过计算连接到每个基台的三个应变计的信号来测量轴向力和 BMs。使用三种不同的模型,分别有不同数量的支持种植体(3、4 和 5 个)、不同的种植体分布条件(小、中、大)和不同的修复体材料(钛、丙烯酸和纤维增强丙烯酸)来测量载荷。与四和五个种植体相比,三个种植体支撑的修复体的 BMs 最大(P<0.001)。BMs 还显著受到种植体分布的影响,最小的分布会产生最大的 BMs(P<0.001)。钛修复体的 BMs 最小(P<0.01)。种植体上的总力与种植体数量和分布以及修复体材料显著相关。