Ferguson T B, Cox J L
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1991 May;51(5):723-32. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(91)90113-5.
Temporary atrial and ventricular pacing in the DVI, VVI, and AOO modes using atrioventricular sequential DVI devices is routinely used in cardiac operations. This study evaluated a new temporary external DDD pacemaker (Medtronic 5345 External Pulse Generator) capable of ten pacing modes. Thirty-nine devices have been applied to 38 adult patients (27 male, 11 female) after a variety of open heart procedures. Group 1 had atrial pacing wires placed 1.5 to 2.0 cm apart superiorly on the right atrium, group 2 had atrial wires placed 1.0 to 1.5 cm apart on the right atrial free wall, and group 3 had atrial wires placed on the right atrial free wall 0.8 cm apart, using a Silastic ring for fixation. Ventricular wires were placed on the free wall (group 1) or the diaphragmatic surface (groups 2 and 3) of the right ventricle. Postoperative atrial and ventricular sensing and pacing thresholds were obtained on return to the intensive care unit; analysis of variance demonstrated a significantly greater atrial sensing threshold in group 3. Four patients in group 1 permanently lost atrial sensing, 1 patient in group 2 intermittently lost atrial sensing at 24 hours with return at 36 hours postoperatively, and 1 patient in group 1 lost ventricular sensing capability. All other patients had adequate atrial and ventricular sensing capability documented until elective pacemaker removal (mean, 166 hours; range, 17 to 667.5 hours). Nineteen patients required some form of temporary pacing postoperatively; 11 patients demonstrated hemodynamic benefit from a pacing mode that is not available on the currently used DVI devices, and 7 of these required true DDD pacing capability. Six patients benefited from atrial pacing with adequate atrial sensing and simultaneous ventricular backup. Burst pacing with the device was used successfully to treat postoperative atrial flutter in 2 patients. We conclude that temporary external DDD pacing is feasible and effective in postoperative cardiac surgical patients. Atrial sensing is possible in most patients but electrode positioning is important for adequate thresholds. In some patients, hemodynamic as well as electrophysiologic improvement can be demonstrated with universal DDD pacing capability as compared with standard DVI pacing.
在心脏手术中,常规使用房室顺序型DVI设备以DVI、VVI和AOO模式进行临时心房和心室起搏。本研究评估了一种新型的临时体外DDD起搏器(美敦力5345体外脉冲发生器),其具有十种起搏模式。39台该设备已应用于38例成年患者(27例男性,11例女性),这些患者接受了各种心脏直视手术。第1组将心房起搏电极在右心房上方相距1.5至2.0厘米处放置;第2组将心房电极在右心房游离壁上相距1.0至1.5厘米处放置;第3组使用硅橡胶环固定,将心房电极在右心房游离壁上相距0.8厘米处放置。心室电极放置在右心室游离壁(第1组)或膈面(第2组和第3组)。返回重症监护病房后获取术后心房和心室感知及起搏阈值;方差分析显示第3组的心房感知阈值显著更高。第1组有4例患者永久性丧失心房感知能力,第2组有1例患者在术后24小时间歇性丧失心房感知能力,术后36小时恢复,第1组有1例患者丧失心室感知能力。所有其他患者在择期取出起搏器前(平均166小时;范围17至667.5小时)均记录有足够的心房和心室感知能力。19例患者术后需要某种形式的临时起搏;11例患者从当前使用的DVI设备无法提供的起搏模式中获得了血流动力学益处,其中7例需要真正的DDD起搏能力。6例患者从具有足够心房感知和同步心室备用的心房起搏中受益。使用该设备的短阵猝发起搏成功治疗了2例患者的术后心房扑动。我们得出结论,临时体外DDD起搏在心脏外科术后患者中是可行且有效的。大多数患者能够实现心房感知,但电极定位对于获得足够的阈值很重要。与标准DVI起搏相比,在一些患者中,通用的DDD起搏能力可显示出血流动力学以及电生理方面的改善。