Cornelisse L E, Gagnńe J P, Seewald R C
Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Ear Hear. 1991 Feb;12(1):47-54. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199102000-00006.
The long-term average speech spectrum (LTASS) was measured at two different recording positions: 30 cm directly in front of the talker (reference position), and at the tragus of the talker's ear (ear-level position), for three groups of subjects: adult males, adult females, and children. Results indicated significant differences in the overall level and frequency spectra between the LTASS obtained at each microphone location. For all three groups of subjects the LTASS measured at the ear-level position consisted of more low frequency energy (i.e., below 1000 Hz) and less high frequency energy (i.e., above 2500 Hz) than did the LTASS measured at the reference microphone position. The findings suggest that the algorithms currently used to prescribe hearing aid gain may underestimate the sensation level of a hearing-impaired individual's own amplified speech productions at frequencies below 1000 Hz and overestimate the sensation level of a talker's own speech above 2500 Hz. The implications of these findings concerning selection of the electroacoustic characteristics of an amplification system for hearing-impaired individuals are discussed.
针对成年男性、成年女性和儿童三组受试者,在两个不同的录音位置测量了长期平均语音频谱(LTASS):一个位置在讲话者正前方30厘米处(参考位置),另一个位置在讲话者耳朵的耳屏处(耳部水平位置)。结果表明,在每个麦克风位置获得的LTASS之间,整体水平和频谱存在显著差异。对于所有三组受试者,在耳部水平位置测量的LTASS比在参考麦克风位置测量的LTASS包含更多的低频能量(即低于1000赫兹)和更少的高频能量(即高于2500赫兹)。研究结果表明,目前用于规定助听器增益的算法可能会低估听力受损个体自身放大语音在1000赫兹以下频率的感觉水平,并高估讲话者自身语音在2500赫兹以上频率的感觉水平。讨论了这些发现对为听力受损个体选择放大系统的电声特性的影响。