• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨语言识别韩语和英语的长期平均语音谱:更好地理解两种语言之间的定量差异。

Cross-language identification of long-term average speech spectra in Korean and English: toward a better understanding of the quantitative difference between two languages.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon City, Korea.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):441-3. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318234f03e.

DOI:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318234f03e
PMID:22546728
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the quantitative differences between Korean and English in long-term average speech spectra (LTASS).

DESIGN

Twenty Korean speakers, who lived in the capital of Korea and spoke standard Korean as their first language, were compared with 20 native English speakers. For the Korean speakers, a passage from a novel and a passage from a leading newspaper article were chosen. For the English speakers, the Rainbow Passage was used. The speech was digitally recorded using GenRad 1982 Precision Sound Level Meter and GoldWave® software and analyzed using MATLAB program.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the LTASS between the Korean subjects reading a news article or a novel. For male subjects, the LTASS of Korean speakers was significantly lower than that of English speakers above 1.6 kHz except at 4 kHz and its difference was more than 5 dB, especially at higher frequencies. For women, the LTASS of Korean speakers showed significantly lower levels at 0.2, 0.5, 1, 1.25, 2, 2.5, 6.3, 8, and 10 kHz, but the differences were less than 5 dB. Compared with English speakers, the LTASS of Korean speakers showed significantly lower levels in frequencies above 2 kHz except at 4 kHz. The difference was less than 5 dB between 2 and 5 kHz but more than 5 dB above 6 kHz.

CONCLUSIONS

To adjust the formula for fitting hearing aids for Koreans, our results based on the LTASS analysis suggest that one needs to raise the gain in high-frequency regions.

摘要

目的

识别韩语和英语在长期平均言语谱(LTASS)中的定量差异。

设计

将 20 名以韩语为母语且居住在韩国首都的韩国人母语者与 20 名以英语为母语的英语母语者进行比较。对于韩国母语者,选择了一篇小说片段和一篇主要报纸文章的片段。对于英语母语者,使用了 Rainbow Passage。使用 GenRad 1982 精密声级计和 GoldWave®软件对语音进行数字记录,并使用 MATLAB 程序进行分析。

结果

阅读新闻文章或小说的韩国受试者之间的 LTASS 没有显著差异。对于男性受试者,除了 4 kHz 及其差异大于 5 dB 外,韩语母语者的 LTASS 显著低于英语母语者在 1.6 kHz 以上的 LTASS,尤其是在较高频率时。对于女性,韩语母语者的 LTASS 在 0.2、0.5、1、1.25、2、2.5、6.3、8 和 10 kHz 时显示出显著较低的水平,但差异小于 5 dB。与英语母语者相比,韩语母语者的 LTASS 在 2 kHz 以上的频率上显著较低,除了在 4 kHz。在 2 到 5 kHz 之间的差异小于 5 dB,但在 6 kHz 以上的差异大于 5 dB。

结论

为了调整适合韩国人的助听器拟合公式,我们基于 LTASS 分析的结果表明,需要提高高频区域的增益。

相似文献

1
Cross-language identification of long-term average speech spectra in Korean and English: toward a better understanding of the quantitative difference between two languages.跨语言识别韩语和英语的长期平均语音谱:更好地理解两种语言之间的定量差异。
Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):441-3. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318234f03e.
2
Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.长期语音噪声中以英语、汉语、韩语为母语的人所发出的美式英语元音的可听度。
Hear Res. 2011 Dec;282(1-2):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
3
Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners.语言迁移导致非母语者听力优势的证据。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct;132(4):2700-10. doi: 10.1121/1.4747615.
4
Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry.韩国言语测听用参考声压级。
Int J Audiol. 2011 Jan;50(1):59-62. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.526637. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
5
Long-Term Average Speech Spectra and Dynamic Ranges of 17 Indian Languages.17 种印度语言的长期平均语音频谱和动态范围。
Am J Audiol. 2021 Dec 9;30(4):1096-1107. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00125. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
6
How Does Speaking Clearly Influence Acoustic Measures? A Speech Clarity Study Using Long-term Average Speech Spectra in Korean Language.清晰发音如何影响声学测量?使用韩语的长期平均语音谱进行语音清晰度研究。
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jun;5(2):68-73. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.2.68. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
7
Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models.母语者和第二语言者的语音感知识别会以不同方式激活与声学语音处理相关的脑区以及与发音-听觉/口部感觉内部模型相关的脑区。
Neuroimage. 2004 Jul;22(3):1182-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.006.
8
Pitch control in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese.粤语食管语音和食管气管语音中的音调控制
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64(5):241-7. doi: 10.1159/000342825. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
9
Amplification rationale for hearing aids based on characteristics of the Japanese language.基于日语特点的助听器放大原理。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2022 Feb;49(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 16.
10
Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.言语对言语的信息掩蔽的跨语言差异:英语与汉语普通话。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Dec;54(6):1506-24. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0282).

引用本文的文献

1
Speech Perception as a Function of the Number of Channels and Channel Interaction in Cochlear Implant Simulation.作为人工耳蜗模拟中通道数量和通道相互作用函数的言语感知
Medeni Med J. 2023 Dec 26;38(4):276-283. doi: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.73454.
2
Machine Learning-Based Hearing Aid Fitting Personalization Using Clinical Fitting Data.基于机器学习的助听器适配个性化:使用临床适配数据。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Oct 15;2022:1667672. doi: 10.1155/2022/1667672. eCollection 2022.
3
Effects of Natural Versus Synthetic Consonant and Vowel Stimuli on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potential.
天然与合成辅音及元音刺激对皮层听觉诱发电位的影响。
J Audiol Otol. 2022 Apr;26(2):68-75. doi: 10.7874/jao.2021.00479. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
4
The Influence of Non-Linear Frequency Compression on the Perception of Speech and Music in Patients with High Frequency Hearing Loss.非线性频率压缩对高频听力损失患者言语和音乐感知的影响。
J Audiol Otol. 2021 Apr;25(2):80-88. doi: 10.7874/jao.2020.00276. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
5
Preferred Compression Threshold and Release Time in Quiet and Noisy Conditions for Elderly Korean Hearing Aid Users.韩国老年助听器使用者在安静和嘈杂环境中的最佳压缩阈值及释放时间
J Audiol Otol. 2017 Sep;21(3):133-139. doi: 10.7874/jao.2017.00066. Epub 2017 Sep 19.