Miller R H, Duplechain J K
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991 Feb;24(1):15-29.
The management of penetrating wounds of the neck provides several decision-making steps that remain controversial. The two basic concepts of management include the idea that all wounds deep to the platysma should be explored and (the more conservative concept) that selective neck exploration should be based on a battery of tests to identify traumatic injuries. The areas of agreement within these two schools of thought include exploration of wounds with obvious injury, exploration of wounds in which patients cannot be stabilized satisfactorily for further testing, and the idea that all patients with wounds deep to the platysma should be admitted to the hospital. The remaining issues, including the need for angiography, barium swallow, or endoscopy, still are contested. Mandatory exploration of neck wounds became popular during World War II. The weapons used, the lack of accurate testing, and delays in treatment caused by transport problems played significant roles in the development of this policy. Proponents of mandatory exploration of neck wounds contend that delays in treatment result in increased mortality rates. Also delays caused by lengthy diagnostic testing have resulted in rapid exsanguination of patients who might otherwise have been surgically salvageable. These factors, along with the potential for undetected injuries and the associated complications (including false aneurysms and mediastinitis) favor mandatory exploration. Advocates of routine neck explorations also note the low morbidity rates associated with a neck exploration. Reported rates of negative exploration are high, however, approaching 45%, and mortality rates vary from 2% to 9%. Selective neck exploration has gained popularity in some centers because of the lower negative exploration rates associated with this treatment, while comparable mortality rates are achieved. May found a negative exploration rate of 12% in his series of selective neck explorations and a mortality rate of approximately 3%. Furthermore, Noyes found that the hospital stay for patients with selective observation management not requiring a neck exploration was 2.8 days, compared with 4.2 days for patients with mandatory but negative neck explorations. A summary of diagnostic techniques and their indications in selecting patients with penetrating neck wounds for surgery is presented in Table 5. It has become apparent that both selective and mandatory explorations of neck wounds play important roles in treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
颈部穿透伤的处理有几个决策步骤,这些步骤仍存在争议。处理的两个基本概念包括:所有超过颈阔肌深度的伤口都应进行探查(以及更为保守的概念,即选择性颈部探查应基于一系列检查以确定创伤性损伤)。这两种思想流派达成共识的领域包括探查有明显损伤的伤口、探查患者无法得到满意稳定以便进一步检查的伤口,以及所有超过颈阔肌深度伤口的患者都应入院治疗的观点。其余问题,包括是否需要血管造影、吞钡检查或内镜检查,仍存在争议。颈部伤口的强制探查在第二次世界大战期间开始流行。所使用的武器、缺乏准确的检查以及运输问题导致的治疗延迟在这一政策的形成中起到了重要作用。颈部伤口强制探查的支持者认为,治疗延迟会导致死亡率上升。此外,冗长的诊断检查导致的延迟已致使一些原本可通过手术挽救的患者迅速失血过多。这些因素,连同未被发现的损伤及相关并发症(包括假性动脉瘤和纵隔炎)的可能性,都支持强制探查。常规颈部探查的支持者还指出颈部探查相关的低发病率。然而,报告的阴性探查率很高,接近45%,死亡率在2%至9%之间。由于这种治疗方式相关的阴性探查率较低,同时能达到相当的死亡率,选择性颈部探查在一些中心越来越受欢迎。梅在他的一系列选择性颈部探查中发现阴性探查率为12%,死亡率约为3%。此外,诺伊斯发现,对于无需颈部探查而进行选择性观察处理的患者,住院时间为2.8天,而对于进行了强制但阴性颈部探查的患者,住院时间为4.2天。表5总结了诊断技术及其在选择颈部穿透伤患者进行手术时的指征。很明显,颈部伤口的选择性和强制性探查在治疗中都发挥着重要作用。(摘要截选至400字)