Suppr超能文献

布地奈德/福莫特罗用于丹麦哮喘维持和缓解治疗的成本效益——基于五项随机对照试验的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever asthma therapy in Denmark--cost-effectiveness analysis based on five randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Wickstrøm Jannie, Dam Nanna, Malmberg Irena, Hansen Brian Bekker, Lange Peter

机构信息

MUUSMANN (COWI), Kolding, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Respir J. 2009 Jul;3(3):169-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-699X.2009.00134.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort SMART) is an effective asthma-management regime where patients use budesonide/formoterol both as maintenance treatment and as additional doses as needed to improve overall asthma control by reducing symptoms and exacerbations. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of the Symbicort SMART regime in Denmark vs higher dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus reliever medication, similar dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta(2)-agonist (ICS/LABA) combination therapy plus reliever medication or higher dose of inhaled ICS/LABA combination therapy plus reliever medication.

METHODS

The cost-effectiveness analyses were based on effectiveness and resource utilisation data, which were prospectively collected during the treatment period in five randomised clinical trials (duration: 24 weeks, 26 weeks or 1 year). Economic analyses were conducted from both a health care sector (direct costs) and a societal perspective [total costs, i.e direct costs + indirect costs (sick leave)]. The time horizon for the economic analyses was 1 year. The effectiveness measure used was the number of avoided severe exacerbations per patient per year.

RESULTS

Patients treated with budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy showed statistically significant fewer severe exacerbations per patient compared with the alternative treatment regimes in all comparisons. Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy was a dominant treatment option when compared with higher dose ICS or higher dose ICS/LABA, i.e. it was more effective at a lower total cost. In two of the three comparisons with a similar ICS/LABA dose, Symbicort SMART was dominant.

CONCLUSION

Cost-effectiveness analyses of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy show that the significant reduction in the number of severe exacerbations observed in all the included clinical studies is predominately obtained at lower costs compared with alternative treatment regimes. This indicates that budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy is a cost-effective treatment option in a Danish setting.

摘要

背景与目的

布地奈德/福莫特罗维持与缓解治疗(信必可都保按需维持治疗,Symbicort SMART)是一种有效的哮喘管理方案,患者将布地奈德/福莫特罗既用作维持治疗,又根据需要额外用药,以通过减轻症状和减少急性加重来改善整体哮喘控制。本研究的目的是确定在丹麦,信必可都保按需维持治疗方案与高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)加缓解药物、相似剂量吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β2受体激动剂(ICS/LABA)联合治疗加缓解药物或高剂量吸入性ICS/LABA联合治疗加缓解药物相比的成本效益。

方法

成本效益分析基于有效性和资源利用数据,这些数据是在五项随机临床试验(持续时间:24周、26周或1年)的治疗期间前瞻性收集的。从医疗保健部门(直接成本)和社会角度[总成本,即直接成本+间接成本(病假)]进行经济分析。经济分析的时间范围为1年。所使用的有效性指标是每位患者每年避免的严重急性加重次数。

结果

在所有比较中,接受布地奈德/福莫特罗维持与缓解治疗的患者与替代治疗方案相比,每位患者的严重急性加重次数在统计学上显著减少。与高剂量ICS或高剂量ICS/LABA相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗维持与缓解治疗是一种占优的治疗选择,即在较低的总成本下更有效。在与相似剂量ICS/LABA的三项比较中的两项中,信必可都保按需维持治疗占优。

结论

布地奈德/福莫特罗维持与缓解治疗的成本效益分析表明,与替代治疗方案相比,在所有纳入的临床研究中观察到的严重急性加重次数显著减少,主要是以较低成本实现的。这表明在丹麦的环境中,布地奈德/福莫特罗维持与缓解治疗是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验