Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Mar;91(3):351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.018.
To examine the use of a submaximal exercise test in detecting change in fitness level after a physical training program, and to investigate the correlation of outcomes as measured submaximally or maximally.
A prospective study in which exercise testing was performed before and after training intervention.
Academic and general hospital and rehabilitation center.
Cancer survivors (N=147) (all cancer types, medical treatment completed > or =3 mo ago) attended a 12-week supervised exercise program.
A 12-week training program including aerobic training, strength training, and group sport.
Outcome measures were changes in peak oxygen uptake (Vo(2)peak) and peak power output (both determined during exhaustive exercise testing) and submaximal heart rate (determined during submaximal testing at a fixed workload).
The Vo(2)peak and peak power output increased and the submaximal heart rate decreased significantly from baseline to postintervention (P<.001). Changes in submaximal heart rate were only weakly correlated with changes in Vo(2)peak and peak power output. Comparing the participants performing submaximal testing with a heart rate less than 140 beats per minute (bpm) versus the participants achieving a heart rate of 140 bpm or higher showed that changes in submaximal heart rate in the group cycling with moderate to high intensity (ie, heart rate > or =140 bpm) were clearly related to changes in VO(2)peak and peak power output.
For the monitoring of training progress in daily clinical practice, changes in heart rate at a fixed submaximal workload that requires a heart rate greater than 140 bpm may serve as an alternative to an exhaustive exercise test.
探讨亚极量运动试验在检测体力训练计划后体能水平变化中的应用,并研究亚极量和极量测量结果的相关性。
前瞻性研究,在训练干预前后进行运动试验。
学术和综合医院及康复中心。
癌症幸存者(N=147)(所有癌症类型,治疗完成>或=3 个月)参加了 12 周的监督锻炼计划。
包括有氧运动、力量训练和团体运动的 12 周训练计划。
主要观察指标为峰值摄氧量(Vo(2)peak)和峰值功率输出(两者均在最大运动试验中确定)和亚极量心率(在固定负荷的亚极量试验中确定)的变化。
从基线到干预后,Vo(2)peak 和峰值功率输出增加,亚极量心率降低(均 P<.001)。亚极量心率的变化与 Vo(2)peak 和峰值功率输出的变化仅有微弱相关性。与达到 140 次/分或更高心率的参与者相比,亚极量测试时心率低于 140 次/分的参与者比较显示,中高强度(即心率>或=140 次/分)的踏车组亚极量心率的变化与 Vo(2)peak 和峰值功率输出的变化明显相关。
对于日常临床实践中训练进展的监测,在需要心率大于 140 次/分的固定亚极量工作负荷下心率的变化可以替代最大运动试验。