Department of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, PO Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Jun;108(6):1510-9. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01396.2009. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
The purpose of this study was to compare the time to failure and muscle activation of young and old adults for a sustained isometric submaximal contraction with the dorsiflexor muscles when the foot was restrained to a force transducer (force-control task) compared with supporting an equivalent inertial load unrestrained in the sagittal plane (position-control task). Seventeen young (23.6+/-6.5 yr) and 12 old (70.0+/-5.0 yr) adults performed the force-control and position-control tasks at 30% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) until task failure on separate days. Despite the similar load torque for each task, time to failure was longer for the force-control than position-control task (10.4+/-4.5 vs. 8.6+/-3.4 min, P=0.03) for the young and old adults. The old adults, however, had a longer time to task failure than the young adults for both tasks (11.4+/-4.4 vs. 8.1+/-2.1 min, P=0.01), with no interaction of age and task (P=0.83). The rate of increase in agonist and antagonist root-mean-square EMG, agonist EMG bursting activity, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate during the fatiguing contraction was greater for the position-control than force-control task for the young and old adults. The old adults had a less rapid rate of increase in EMG activity, fluctuations in motor output, and cardiovascular measures than the young adults for both tasks. Development of fatigue can be manipulated in young and old adults by providing greater support to the foot and less ankle compliance during daily and ergonomic tasks that require prolonged activation of the lower leg. Minimizing load compliance to one degree of freedom during a position-control task maintained the greater fatigue resistance with age for an isometric contraction.
本研究旨在比较年轻人和老年人在将足部固定于力传感器时进行的维持性等长亚最大收缩(力控制任务)与支撑等效惯性负载(位置控制任务)时的背屈肌的失效时间和肌肉激活情况。17 名年轻人(23.6±6.5 岁)和 12 名老年人(70.0±5.0 岁)分别在不同的日子里以 30%最大自主收缩(MVC)完成力控制和位置控制任务,直到任务失败。尽管每个任务的负载转矩相似,但力控制任务的失效时间长于位置控制任务(年轻人和老年人分别为 10.4±4.5 分钟和 8.6±3.4 分钟,P=0.03)。然而,老年人在两个任务中的失效时间都长于年轻人(老年人分别为 11.4±4.4 分钟和 8.1±2.1 分钟,P=0.01),年龄和任务之间没有交互作用(P=0.83)。在疲劳收缩过程中,年轻人和老年人的拮抗剂和拮抗剂均方根肌电图(EMG)、拮抗剂 EMG 爆发活动、平均动脉压和心率的增加率在位置控制任务中大于力控制任务。与年轻人相比,老年人在两个任务中都具有较低的 EMG 活动、运动输出波动和心血管指标的增加率。通过在需要小腿长时间激活的日常和人体工程学任务中为足部提供更大的支撑并减少踝关节顺应性,可以操纵年轻人和老年人的疲劳发展。在位置控制任务中,将负载顺应性限制在一个自由度以内,可以保持与年龄相关的等长收缩的更大疲劳阻力。