Hunter Sandra K, Yoon Tejin, Farinella Joseph, Griffith Erin E, Ng Alexander V
Department of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, P. O. Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Aug;105(2):463-72. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90398.2008. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
The purpose was to compare the time to failure and muscle activation patterns for a sustained isometric submaximal contraction with the dorsiflexor muscles when the foot was restrained to a force transducer (force task) compared with supporting an equivalent inertial load and unrestrained (position task). Fifteen men and women (mean+/-SD; 21.1+/-1.4 yr) performed the force and position tasks at 20% maximal voluntary contraction force until task failure. Maximal voluntary contraction force performed before the force and position tasks was similar (333+/-71 vs. 334+/-65 N), but the time to task failure was briefer for the position task (10.0+/-6.2 vs. 21.3+/-17.8 min, P<0.05). The rate of increase in agonist root-mean-square electromyogram (EMG), EMG bursting activity, rating of perceived exertion, fluctuations in motor output, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate during the fatiguing contraction was greater for the position task. EMG activity of the vastus lateralis (lower leg stabilizer) and medial gastrocnemius (antagonist) increased more rapidly during the position task, but coactivation ratios (agonist vs. antagonist) were similar during the two tasks. Thus the difference in time to failure for the two tasks with the dorsiflexor muscles involved a greater level of neural activity and rate of motor unit recruitment during the position task, but did not involve a difference in coactivation. These findings have implications for rehabilitation and ergonomics in minimizing fatigue during prolonged activation of the dorsiflexor muscles.
目的是比较当足部固定在力传感器上进行背屈肌持续等长次最大收缩时(力任务)与支撑等效惯性负荷且不受约束时(位置任务)的失效时间和肌肉激活模式。15名男性和女性(平均±标准差;21.1±1.4岁)以最大自主收缩力的20%执行力任务和位置任务,直至任务失败。在力任务和位置任务之前进行的最大自主收缩力相似(333±71对334±65 N),但位置任务的任务失效时间更短(10.0±6.2对21.3±17.8分钟,P<0.05)。在疲劳收缩期间,位置任务的主动肌均方根肌电图(EMG)、EMG爆发活动、主观用力程度评分、运动输出波动、平均动脉压和心率的增加速率更大。在位置任务期间,股外侧肌(小腿稳定肌)和腓肠肌内侧头(拮抗肌)的EMG活动增加更快,但在两项任务中共同激活率(主动肌与拮抗肌)相似。因此,涉及背屈肌的两项任务在失效时间上的差异在于位置任务期间神经活动水平和运动单位募集速率更高,但共同激活没有差异。这些发现对康复和人体工程学在使背屈肌长时间激活期间的疲劳最小化方面具有启示意义。