Department of History & Philosophy, City University of New York-York College, Jamaica, New York 11451, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Mar;39(3):605-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.12.003.
Advance directives are often used to help patients articulate their end-of-life treatment preferences and guide proxy decision makers in making health care decisions when patients cannot. This case study and commentary puts forth a situation in which a palliative care consultation team encountered a patient with an advance directive that instructed her proxy decision maker to consider estate tax implications when making end-of-life decisions. Following presentation of the case, the authors focus on two ethical issues: 1) the appropriateness of considering patients' financial goals and values in medical decision making and 2) whether certain kinds of patient values should be considered more or less relevant than others as reasons for expressed treatment preferences. Clinicians are encouraged to accept a wide range of patient values as relevant to the clinical decision-making process and to balance the influence of those values with more traditional notions of clinical harm and benefit.
预立医疗指示常用于帮助患者表达其临终治疗偏好,并在患者无法表达意见时指导代理人在做出医疗决策。本案例研究和评论提出了一种情况,即姑息治疗咨询小组遇到了一位患者,其预立医疗指示指示其代理人在做出临终决策时考虑遗产税的影响。在介绍案例后,作者重点讨论了两个伦理问题:1)在医疗决策中考虑患者的财务目标和价值观是否合适;2)作为表达治疗偏好的理由,某些类型的患者价值观是否应被认为比其他价值观更相关或更不相关。鼓励临床医生接受广泛的患者价值观作为临床决策过程的相关因素,并平衡这些价值观与传统的临床伤害和利益观念的影响。