• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[An evaluation of the quality of health web pages using a validated questionnaire].[使用经过验证的问卷对健康网页质量进行评估]
Aten Primaria. 2011 Jan;43(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2010.01.007. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
2
An evaluation of Spanish and English on-line information sources regarding pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period.对有关怀孕、分娩及产后阶段的西班牙语和英语在线信息来源的评估。
Midwifery. 2018 Mar;58:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
3
Parents on the web: risks for quality management of cough in children.网络上的家长:儿童咳嗽质量管理的风险
Pediatrics. 2000 Jan;105(1):e1. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.1.e1.
4
[Health information on the Internet and trust marks as quality indicators: vaccines case study].[互联网上的健康信息及作为质量指标的信任标志:疫苗案例研究]
Aten Primaria. 2009 Oct;41(10):534-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 May 9.
5
Search Engine Ranking, Quality, and Content of Web Pages That Are Critical Versus Noncritical of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗持批判与非批判态度的网页的搜索引擎排名、质量和内容
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Jan;58(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.016. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
6
Evaluation of the quality of the general health information webpages in Spain: influence of page source.西班牙一般健康信息网页质量评估:网页来源的影响。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2013 Dec;38(4):382-95. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2013.812645. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
7
Googling endometriosis: a systematic review of information available on the Internet.在谷歌上搜索子宫内膜异位症:对互联网上可用信息的系统评价。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):451-458.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1007. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
8
Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.互联网上以患者为导向的甲氨蝶呤信息网站:完整性、准确性、格式、可靠性、可信度和可读性综述
J Rheumatol. 2009 Jan;36(1):41-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080430.
9
Prospective analysis of the quality of Spanish health information web sites after 3 years.三年后西班牙健康信息网站质量的前瞻性分析。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2016 Dec;41(4):417-29. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2015.1064426. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
10
Quality of web pages about second-trimester medical abortion: A cross-sectional study of readability, comprehensiveness, and transparency.网页质量关于中期妊娠药物流产:横断面研究可读性、全面性和透明度。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):2683-2691. doi: 10.1111/jan.14080. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of a Questionnaire of Food Education Content on School Catering Websites in Spain.验证西班牙学校餐饮网站食品教育内容问卷
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 20;19(6):3685. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063685.
2
How good is online information on fibromyalgia? An analysis of quality and readability of websites on fibromyalgia in Spanish.在线纤维肌痛信息质量如何?对西班牙语纤维肌痛网站的质量和可读性分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 5;10(7):e037065. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037065.
3
Adapting the content of cancer web sites to the information needs of patients: reliability and readability.使癌症网站的内容适应患者的信息需求:可靠性与可读性。
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Dec;19(12):956-66. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0050. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

本文引用的文献

1
[Questionnaire to evaluate health web sites according to European criteria].[根据欧洲标准评估健康网站的调查问卷]
Aten Primaria. 2006 Sep 30;38(5):268-74. doi: 10.1157/13092985.
2
Unraveling the web: an evaluation of the content quality, usability, and readability of nutrition web sites.剖析网络:营养网站的内容质量、可用性和可读性评估
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2005 Nov-Dec;37(6):300-5. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60160-7.
3
Quality and safety issues of web-based information about herbal medicines in the treatment of cancer.基于网络的草药治疗癌症信息的质量与安全问题
Complement Ther Med. 2004 Dec;12(4):217-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2004.09.005.
4
Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the World Wide Web: what can our patients actually use?评估万维网上健康信息质量的工具:我们的患者实际能用什么?
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Jan;74(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.10.001.
5
Evaluation of web accessibility of consumer health information websites.消费者健康信息网站的网络可及性评估。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:743-7.
6
Improving the quality of health information: the contribution of C-H-i-Q.提高健康信息质量:C-H-i-Q的贡献。
Health Expect. 2002 Sep;5(3):270-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00189.x.
7
Health information on the internet: quality issues and international initiatives.互联网上的健康信息:质量问题与国际倡议。
JAMA. 2002;287(20):2713-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2713.
8
Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.评估万维网上面向消费者的健康信息质量的实证研究:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2002;287(20):2691-700. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691.
9
How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet.如何辨别优劣:互联网健康信息质量评级工具简要指南
BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):598-602. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.598.
10
Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites.万维网上的乳腺癌:信息质量与网站受欢迎程度的横断面调查
BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):577-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.577.

[使用经过验证的问卷对健康网页质量进行评估]

[An evaluation of the quality of health web pages using a validated questionnaire].

作者信息

Conesa Fuentes Maria del Carmen, Aguinaga Ontoso Enrique, Hernández Morante Juan José

机构信息

Escuela de Enfermería, Universidad Católica San Antonio, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2011 Jan;43(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2010.01.007. Epub 2010 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2010.01.007
PMID:20304528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7024504/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the quality of general health information in Spanish language web pages, and the official Regional Services web pages from the different Autonomous Regions.

DESIGN

It is a cross-sectional study. We have used a previously validated questionnaire to study the present state of the health information on Internet for a lay-user point of view.

PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS

By mean of PageRank (Google®), we obtained a group of webs, including a total of 65 health web pages. We applied some exclusion criteria, and finally obtained a total of 36 webs. We also analyzed the official web pages from the different Health Services in Spain (19 webs), making a total of 54 health web pages.

RESULTS

In the light of our data, we observed that, the quality of the general information health web pages was generally rather low, especially regarding the information quality. Not one page reached the maximum score (19 points). The mean score of the web pages was of 9.8±2.8.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, to avoid the problems arising from the lack of quality, health professionals should design advertising campaigns and other media to teach the lay-user how to evaluate the information quality.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估西班牙语网页以及不同自治区官方区域服务网页上一般健康信息的质量。

设计

这是一项横断面研究。我们使用了一份先前经过验证的问卷,从普通用户的角度研究互联网上健康信息的现状。

参与者和干预措施

通过PageRank(谷歌®),我们获得了一组网页,其中包括总共65个健康网页。我们应用了一些排除标准,最终获得了总共36个网页。我们还分析了西班牙不同卫生服务机构的官方网页(19个网页),共计54个健康网页。

结果

根据我们的数据,我们观察到,一般信息健康网页的质量普遍较低,尤其是在信息质量方面。没有一个页面达到最高分(19分)。网页的平均得分为9.8±2.8。

结论

总之,为避免因质量不足而产生的问题,卫生专业人员应设计广告活动和其他媒体,教导普通用户如何评估信息质量。