Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jun;51(6):1467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.12.070. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
The national burden of venous disease and use of ultrasound (US) in the outpatient and emergency department (ED) settings has not been well described. The objective of this study is to describe venous disease in the outpatient and ED settings nationally as well as to characterize the use of US for diagnosis of venous disease, including phlebitis.
Data from the 1997 to 2006 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) were compiled, and complex sampling methods were used to describe the number of outpatient and ED visits for adults given a diagnosis of venous disease or phlebitis by ICD-9 coding. Logistic regression analysis with calculated odds ratios are used to examined patient visit characteristics and use of US.
During the 10 years studied, an office or ED visit for venous disease occurred over 46 million times, for an average of 4.6 million visits per year, with this rate increasing from 4.03 million to 5.71 million per year (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.01). The majority of these patients were seen by specialists, such as surgeons or cardiologists, but a significant number were also seen by primary care providers (PCP). There were 2 million office visits (PCP and specialists) on average per year with no significant increase. There were approximately 236,000 ED visits for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) on average per year, which showed a small increase (OR 1.01, CI 1.00-1.01). Visits for DVT and phlebitis were as likely to be seen by PCPs as ED physicians. Non-DVT venous disease is much more likely to be seen by a surgeon (OR 4.88, CI 3.53-6.74) than a PCP. DVT is much less likely to be diagnosed by a specialist (OR 0.27, CI 0.18-0.29) than a PCP. Insurance status and geographic region were not associated with DVT or non-DVT venous disease diagnosis.
Nationally, a significant and growing number of patients with venous disease are being seen in the outpatient setting by PCPs and specialists. A significant number of patients with DVT are being seen in the outpatient setting, but without a trend away from care in the ED over the 10-year study period. Additionally, the majority of patients with DVT diagnosis do not seem to be getting ultrasounds at the same visit. Many of these patients are being seen by PCPs who may require additional training and infrastructure for appropriate patient care.
静脉疾病的国家负担以及在门诊和急诊(ED)环境中使用超声(US)的情况尚未得到很好的描述。本研究的目的是描述全国范围内门诊和 ED 环境中的静脉疾病,并描述 US 用于诊断静脉疾病(包括血栓性静脉炎)的使用情况,包括静脉炎。
编译了 1997 年至 2006 年国家门诊医疗保健调查(NAMCS)和国家医院门诊医疗保健调查(NHAMCS)的数据,并使用复杂的抽样方法描述了根据 ICD-9 编码诊断为静脉疾病或血栓性静脉炎的成年患者的门诊和 ED 就诊次数。使用计算出的优势比进行逻辑回归分析,以检查患者就诊特征和 US 的使用情况。
在研究的 10 年中,静脉疾病的门诊或 ED 就诊次数超过 4600 万次,平均每年就诊 460 万人次,就诊率从 403 万增加到每年 571 万人次(比值比[OR]为 1.01,置信区间[CI]为 1.00-1.01)。这些患者大多数是由外科医生或心脏病专家等专科医生就诊,但也有相当一部分是由初级保健提供者(PCP)就诊。每年平均有 200 万次门诊就诊(PCP 和专科医生),没有明显增加。每年平均有大约 236,000 次 ED 就诊用于深静脉血栓形成(DVT),就诊率略有增加(OR 1.01,CI 1.00-1.01)。PCP 和 ED 医生同样可能会看 DVT 和血栓性静脉炎患者。非 DVT 静脉疾病更有可能由外科医生(OR 4.88,CI 3.53-6.74)而不是 PCP 诊断。与 PCP 相比,专科医生更不可能诊断 DVT(OR 0.27,CI 0.18-0.29)。保险状况和地理位置与 DVT 或非 DVT 静脉疾病的诊断无关。
在全国范围内,越来越多的静脉疾病患者在门诊由 PCP 和专科医生就诊。在门诊就诊的 DVT 患者数量众多,但在 10 年的研究期间,并没有从 ED 就诊转移的趋势。此外,大多数 DVT 诊断患者似乎没有在同一次就诊中进行超声检查。这些患者中有很多是由 PCP 就诊的,他们可能需要额外的培训和基础设施来进行适当的患者护理。