Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Civile di Livorno, Livorno, Italy (Mumoli, Cei, Camaiti, Palmiero); Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Beata Vergine di Mendrisio, Ticino, Switzerland (Vitale); Emergency Department, Ospedale della Val d'Arda, Piacenza, Italy (Giorgi-Pierfranceschi); Primary Ambulatory Care, Livorno, Italy (Sabatini); Primary Care, Porto Santo Stefano, Grosseto, Italy (Tulino); Department of Vascular Medicine, ASL Di Romagna, Ravenna, Italy (Bucherini); Department of Internal Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera, Cosenza, Italy (Bova); Angiology Unit, ASL 1 Avezzano Sulmona L'Aquila, Avezzano (AQ), Italy (Mastroiacovo); Primary Ambulatory Care, Pisa, Italy (Puccetti); Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Varese, Italy (Dentali).
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Nov;15(6):535-539. doi: 10.1370/afm.2109.
Patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limb represent a diagnostic dilemma for general practitioners. Compression ultrasonography (US) is universally recognized as the best test of choice. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of compression US performed by general practitioners given short training in the management of symptomatic proximal DVT.
From May 2014 to May 2016, we evaluated in a multicenter, prospective cohort study all consecutive outpatients with suspected DVT; bilateral proximal lower limb compression US was performed by general practitioners and by physicians expert in vascular US, each group blinded to the other's findings. In all examinations with a negative or nondiagnostic result, compression US was repeated by the same operator after 5 to 7 days. Inter-observer agreement and accuracy were calculated.
We enrolled a total of 1,107 patients. The expert physicians diagnosed DVT in 200 patients, corresponding to an overall prevalence of 18.1% (95% CI, 15.8%-20.3%). The agreement between the trained general practitioners and the experts was excellent (Cohen κ = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.88). Compression US performed by general practitioners had a sensitivity of 90.0% (95% CI, 88.2%-91.8%) and a specificity of 97.1% (95% CI, 96.2%-98.1%) with a diagnostic accuracy for DVT of 95.8% (95% CI, 94.7%-97.0%).
Our results suggest that, even in hands of physicians not expert in vascular US, compression US can be a reliable tool in the diagnosis of DVT. We found that the sensitivity achieved by general practitioners appeared suboptimal, however, so future studies should evaluate the implementation of proper training strategies to maximize skill.
下肢疑似深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的患者对全科医生来说是一个诊断难题。压缩超声(US)被普遍认为是最佳选择。我们评估了接受过近端症状性 DVT 管理短期培训的全科医生进行压缩 US 的诊断准确性。
从 2014 年 5 月至 2016 年 5 月,我们在一项多中心前瞻性队列研究中评估了所有连续疑似 DVT 的门诊患者;由全科医生和血管超声专家进行双侧下肢近端压缩 US,两组均对彼此的结果不知情。在所有阴性或非诊断性结果的检查中,由同一名操作者在 5 至 7 天后重复进行压缩 US。计算了观察者间的一致性和准确性。
我们共纳入了 1107 名患者。专家医生诊断出 200 名患者患有 DVT,总体患病率为 18.1%(95%可信区间,15.8%-20.3%)。经过培训的全科医生与专家医生之间的一致性极好(Cohen κ=0.86;95%可信区间,0.84-0.88)。全科医生进行的压缩 US 的敏感性为 90.0%(95%可信区间,88.2%-91.8%),特异性为 97.1%(95%可信区间,96.2%-98.1%),DVT 的诊断准确性为 95.8%(95%可信区间,94.7%-97.0%)。
我们的结果表明,即使在非血管超声专家医生手中,压缩 US 也可以成为 DVT 诊断的可靠工具。我们发现全科医生的敏感性似乎不理想,因此未来的研究应评估实施适当的培训策略以最大程度地提高技能。