• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去急诊还是不去急诊:NHS24 向急诊部门的转诊。

To ED or not to ED: NHS 24 referrals to the emergency department.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2010 Mar;27(3):213-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.064261.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2008.064261
PMID:20304891
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the opinions of consultants in emergency medicine and general practitioners (GPs) on the appropriateness of NHS 24 referrals to the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

170 NHS 24 referrals to the ED were reviewed by six GPs and six emergency consultants who were asked their opinion as to which out-of-hours service would be most appropriate for the patient. Modal responses from both groups were calculated for each referral. Consensus within groups and levels of agreement were calculated.

RESULTS

Modal responses agreed with an ED disposal in 59.2% of cases in the emergency consultant group with a 90% consensus rate. The GP group agreed with an ED disposal in only 47% of cases with a 75.9% consensus rate. A primary care referral response was the mode in 20.8% of the emergency consultant group compared with 35.7% in the GP group. Consensus was reached in 76.3% of the emergency consultant responses and 81.7% of GP responses. The difference in opinion between the two study groups was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs and consultants in emergency medicine both believe a high proportion of NHS 24 referrals to the ED should be handled by primary care services. This would suggest that, compared with previous out-of-hours practice, NHS 24 favours an ED outcome. The results indicate a large proportion of primary care patients are being handled inappropriately and uneconomically in the ED setting. There is a need for ongoing improvement of the telephone triage service provided by NHS 24.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在比较急诊医学顾问和全科医生(GP)对 NHS 24 转至急诊部(ED)的适宜性的意见。

方法

对 NHS 24 转至 ED 的 170 例患者进行了回顾,六位全科医生和六位急诊顾问被要求就哪种非工作时间服务最适合患者发表意见。计算了每组对每个转介的模式反应。计算了组内和组间的一致性。

结果

在急诊顾问组中,有 59.2%的情况下,模式反应同意 ED 处置,共识率为 90%。GP 组仅在 47%的情况下同意 ED 处置,共识率为 75.9%。初级保健转介反应是急诊顾问组中的 20.8%,而 GP 组中的 35.7%。在急诊顾问的 76.3%和 GP 的 81.7%的反应中达成了共识。两组研究人员之间的意见差异具有统计学意义。

结论

GP 和急诊医学顾问都认为 NHS 24 转至 ED 的很大一部分患者应该由初级保健服务处理。这表明与之前的非工作时间实践相比,NHS 24 更倾向于 ED 结果。结果表明,很大一部分初级保健患者在 ED 环境中处理不当且不经济。需要持续改进 NHS 24 提供的电话分诊服务。

相似文献

1
To ED or not to ED: NHS 24 referrals to the emergency department.去急诊还是不去急诊:NHS24 向急诊部门的转诊。
Emerg Med J. 2010 Mar;27(3):213-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.064261.
2
Safety and efficiency of triaging low urgent self-referred patients to a general practitioner at an acute care post: an observational study.分诊低紧急度自行就诊患者至急性护理后全科医生处的安全性和效率:一项观察性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2012 Nov;29(11):877-81. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200539. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
3
Out-of-hours demand for GP care and emergency services: patients' choices and referrals by general practitioners and ambulance services.非工作时间对全科医生诊疗服务和急救服务的需求:患者的选择以及全科医生和救护车服务的转诊情况。
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Aug 1;8:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-46.
4
A baseline audit of referral and treatment delivered to patients in the intermediate minor oral surgery service in Croydon PCT.对克罗伊登初级保健信托基金中级小型口腔外科服务中患者的转诊和治疗进行的基线审计。
Prim Dent Care. 2012 Jan;19(1):23-8. doi: 10.1308/135576112798990728.
5
Validity of telephone and physical triage in emergency care: the Netherlands Triage System.电话和体格分诊在急救护理中的有效性:荷兰分诊系统。
Fam Pract. 2011 Jun;28(3):334-41. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmq097. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
6
Abdominal pain patient referrals to emergency surgical service: appropriateness of diagnosis and attitudes of general practitioners.腹痛患者转诊至急诊外科服务:诊断的适宜性及全科医生的态度
Coll Antropol. 2009 Dec;33(4):1239-43.
7
Emergency department poisoning visits in children younger than 6 years: comparing referrals by a regional poison control center to referrals by other sources.6岁以下儿童急诊科中毒就诊情况:比较地区中毒控制中心的转诊与其他来源的转诊。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Dec;28(12):1343-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318276c07a.
8
Emergency department referral patterns of Australian general practitioner registrars: a cross-sectional analysis of prevalence, nature and associations.澳大利亚全科医生注册实习生的急诊科转诊模式:患病率、性质及关联的横断面分析
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Feb;43(1):21-28. doi: 10.1071/AH17005.
9
Review of calls to NHS Direct related to attendance in the paediatric emergency department.对与小儿急诊科就诊相关的国民保健服务(NHS)Direct求助电话的审查。
Emerg Med J. 2006 Dec;23(12):911-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.039339.
10
Patients either contacting a general practice cooperative or accident and emergency department out of hours: a comparison.非工作时间联系全科医疗合作社或急诊科的患者:一项比较。
Emerg Med J. 2006 Sep;23(9):731-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.032359.

引用本文的文献

1
A Symptom-Checker for Adult Patients Visiting an Interdisciplinary Emergency Care Center and the Safety of Patient Self-Triage: Real-Life Prospective Evaluation.成人患者就诊于多学科急诊中心的症状自查工具和患者自我分诊的安全性:真实世界前瞻性评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 27;26:e58157. doi: 10.2196/58157.
2
Telephone Triage for Emergency Patients Reduces Unnecessary Ambulance Use: A Propensity Score Analysis With Population-Based Data in Osaka City, Japan.电话分诊可减少急诊患者不必要的救护车使用:基于日本大阪市人群数据的倾向评分分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 28;10:896506. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.896506. eCollection 2022.
3
Contact to the out-of-hours service among Danish parents of small children - a qualitative interview study.
丹麦幼儿家长与非工作时间服务的接触——一项定性访谈研究
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Jun;36(2):216-223. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1459431. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
4
Patient Safety Incidents Involving Sick Children in Primary Care in England and Wales: A Mixed Methods Analysis.英格兰和威尔士初级医疗中涉及患病儿童的患者安全事件:一项混合方法分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 17;14(1):e1002217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002217. eCollection 2017 Jan.