Rees Philippa, Edwards Adrian, Powell Colin, Hibbert Peter, Williams Huw, Makeham Meredith, Carter Ben, Luff Donna, Parry Gareth, Avery Anthony, Sheikh Aziz, Donaldson Liam, Carson-Stevens Andrew
Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 17;14(1):e1002217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002217. eCollection 2017 Jan.
The UK performs poorly relative to other economically developed countries on numerous indicators of care quality for children. The contribution of iatrogenic harm to these outcomes is unclear. As primary care is the first point of healthcare contact for most children, we sought to investigate the safety of care provided to children in this setting.
We undertook a mixed methods investigation of reports of primary care patient safety incidents involving sick children from England and Wales' National Reporting and Learning System between 1 January 2005 and 1 December 2013. Two reviewers independently selected relevant incident reports meeting prespecified criteria, and then descriptively analyzed these reports to identify the most frequent and harmful incident types. This was followed by an in-depth thematic analysis of a purposive sample of reports to understand the reasons underpinning incidents. Key candidate areas for strengthening primary care provision and reducing the risks of systems failures were then identified through multidisciplinary discussions. Of 2,191 safety incidents identified from 2,178 reports, 30% (n = 658) were harmful, including 12 deaths and 41 cases of severe harm. The children involved in these incidents had respiratory conditions (n = 387; 18%), injuries (n = 289; 13%), nonspecific signs and symptoms, e.g., fever (n = 281; 13%), and gastrointestinal or genitourinary conditions (n = 268; 12%), among others. Priority areas for improvement included safer systems for medication provision in community pharmacies; triage processes to enable effective and timely assessment, diagnosis, and referral of acutely sick children attending out-of-hours services; and enhanced communication for robust safety netting between professionals and parents. The main limitations of this study result from underreporting of safety incidents and variable data quality. Our findings therefore require further exploration in longitudinal studies utilizing case review methods.
This study highlights opportunities to reduce iatrogenic harm and avoidable child deaths. Globally, healthcare systems with primary-care-led models of delivery must now examine their existing practices to determine the prevalence and burden of these priority safety issues, and utilize improvement methods to achieve sustainable improvements in care quality.
在儿童护理质量的众多指标方面,英国相对于其他经济发达国家表现不佳。医源性伤害对这些结果的影响尚不清楚。由于初级保健是大多数儿童首次接触医疗保健的环节,我们试图调查在这种情况下为儿童提供的护理的安全性。
我们对2005年1月1日至2013年12月1日期间英格兰和威尔士国家报告与学习系统中涉及患病儿童的初级保健患者安全事件报告进行了混合方法调查。两名评审员独立选择符合预先设定标准的相关事件报告,然后对这些报告进行描述性分析,以确定最常见和最有害的事件类型。随后,对有目的抽样的报告进行深入的主题分析,以了解事件背后的原因。通过多学科讨论确定了加强初级保健服务和降低系统故障风险的关键候选领域。从2178份报告中识别出2191起安全事件,其中30%(n = 658)是有害的,包括12例死亡和41例严重伤害。这些事件涉及的儿童患有呼吸系统疾病(n = 387;18%)、受伤(n = 289;13%)、非特异性体征和症状,如发烧(n = 281;13%)以及胃肠道或泌尿生殖系统疾病(n = 268;12%)等。改进的优先领域包括社区药房更安全的药物供应系统;分诊流程,以便对非工作时间就诊的急症儿童进行有效及时的评估、诊断和转诊;以及加强专业人员与家长之间的沟通,以建立强有力的安全保障。本研究的主要局限性源于安全事件报告不足和数据质量参差不齐。因此,我们的研究结果需要在利用病例审查方法的纵向研究中进一步探索。
本研究突出了减少医源性伤害和避免儿童可避免死亡的机会。在全球范围内,以初级保健为主导的医疗服务模式的医疗系统现在必须审视其现有做法,以确定这些优先安全问题的发生率和负担,并利用改进方法实现护理质量的可持续提升。