Medicine Service, New Mexico VA Health Care System, 1501 San Pedro Drive SE, Albuquerque, NM 87108, USA.
Prev Med. 2010 May-Jun;50(5-6):297-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
Determine whether colorectal cancer screening adherence is greater with fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) or guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT).
We used electronic health records to identify 3869 New Mexico Veterans Affairs Health Care System primary care patients due for screening in 2008 for whom fecal blood testing was appropriate. We invited randomly selected patients by mail to participate in a study comparing FIT and gFOBT. We randomly allocated 404 subjects to receive FIT (n=202) or gFOBT (n=202) by mail. We determined the proportion of subjects completing testing within 90days of agreeing to participate in the study. We also used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate screening completion, adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, clinic site, previous gFOBT testing, and co-morbidity.
Screening adherence was higher with FIT than gFOBT (61.4% vs. 50.5%, P=0.03). The adjusted odds ratio for completing FIT vs. gFOBT was 1.56, 95% CI 1.04, 2.32.
In a clinic setting of patients who were due for colorectal cancer screening, adherence was significantly higher with FIT than gFOBT.
确定粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)或愈创木脂粪便潜血检测(gFOBT)用于结直肠癌筛查时,患者的依从性是否更高。
我们使用电子健康记录,确定了 2008 年在新墨西哥州退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中需要进行筛查的 3869 名初级保健患者,这些患者适合进行粪便血液检测。我们通过邮件随机邀请患者参加一项比较 FIT 和 gFOBT 的研究。我们通过邮件将 404 名患者随机分配至接受 FIT(n=202)或 gFOBT(n=202)。我们确定了在同意参加研究的 90 天内完成检测的患者比例。我们还使用多变量逻辑回归,根据年龄、性别、种族/民族、诊所地点、既往 gFOBT 检测和合并症,评估了筛查的完成情况。
与 gFOBT 相比,FIT 的筛查依从性更高(61.4% vs. 50.5%,P=0.03)。与 gFOBT 相比,完成 FIT 检测的调整优势比为 1.56,95%置信区间为 1.04-2.32。
在适合进行结直肠癌筛查的诊所环境中,与 gFOBT 相比,FIT 的依从性显著更高。