The Gastroenterology Unit, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Med Screen. 2011;18(3):135-41. doi: 10.1258/jms.2011.010147.
To compare the uptake of faecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT) with guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in a screening programme, with specific attention to the demographic and socioeconomic factors that might affect test uptake.
The Clalit Health Service screening programme, Israel.
Average-risk individuals aged 50-75 years were randomized into a FIT arm or gFOBT arm using a programme based on the socioeconomic status (SES) of their primary care clinics. G-FOBT was performed with Hemoccult SENSA™ (3 evacuations) and FIT with the OC- MICRO(TM) (3 evacuations, refrigerating mandated). The GLIMMIX model was used.
There were 5,464 and 10,668 eligible participants in the FIT and gFOBT arms respectively. Compliance in taking the kits was better (but not statistically significantly better) with gFOBT (37.8% vs. 29.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.43 [95% CI 0.73-2.80]; P = 0.227). Kit return was higher in the FIT arm (65.0% vs. 78.9%; OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.24-0.83], P = 0.021). Overall test uptake was affected by age, gender, being immigrant and SES (determined by whether or not the participant paid national insurance tax, and the SES of the primary care clinic). The overall uptake of gFOBT and FIT was comparable (OR 0.996 [95% CI 0.46-2.17], P = 0.99).
Overall compliance for test uptake was comparable between the two methods despite the more demanding procedure in the FIT arm. Sociodemographic parameters were the major determinants of compliance. An educational programme, with emphasis on the sociodemographic characteristics of the target population, should be instigated.
比较粪便潜血免疫化学试验(FIT)和愈创木脂粪便潜血试验(gFOBT)在筛查项目中的应用,并特别关注可能影响检测率的人口统计学和社会经济学因素。
以色列的 Clalit 健康服务筛查项目。
采用基于初级保健诊所社会经济状况(SES)的方案,将 50-75 岁的平均风险个体随机分配到 FIT 组或 gFOBT 组。gFOBT 采用 Hemoccult SENSA™(3 次排便)进行,FIT 采用 OC- MICRO(TM)(3 次排便,需冷藏)进行。使用 GLIMMIX 模型。
FIT 组和 gFOBT 组分别有 5464 名和 10668 名符合条件的参与者。gFOBT 组(37.8%比 29.3%;优势比[OR] 1.43[95%CI 0.73-2.80];P=0.227)服用试剂盒的依从性更好(但无统计学意义)。FIT 组试剂盒返还率更高(65.0%比 78.9%;OR 0.45[95%CI 0.24-0.83],P=0.021)。总体检测率受年龄、性别、移民和 SES(通过参与者是否缴纳国家保险税以及初级保健诊所的 SES 来确定)的影响。gFOBT 和 FIT 的总体检测率相当(OR 0.996[95%CI 0.46-2.17],P=0.99)。
尽管 FIT 组的检测程序要求更高,但两种方法的总体检测依从率相当。人口统计学参数是依从性的主要决定因素。应启动一个教育计划,重点关注目标人群的社会人口统计学特征。