Department of Psychology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5742, USA.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Jul;34(8):1249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
Elucidation of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the circadian clock, along with the realization that these mechanisms are operative in both central and peripheral tissues, has revolutionized circadian biology. Further, these observations have resulted in an explosion of interest in the health implications of circadian organization and disorganization at both molecular and physiological levels. Thus, recent research has implicated mutations and polymorphisms of circadian clock genes in diabetes and obesity, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. At the neuro-behavioral level, circadian clock genes have also been implicated in sleep disorders, drug and alcohol addiction, and other psychiatric conditions. While such findings are frequently described as revealing "non-circadian" effects of clock genes, it remains possible that most of these non-circadian effects are in fact secondary to the loss of cellular and systemic rhythmicity. This review summarizes the evidence linking circadian clock genes to biobehavioral dysregulation, and considers criteria for defining a pleiotropic clock gene effect as non-circadian.
阐明生物钟的细胞和分子机制,以及认识到这些机制在中枢和外周组织中都起作用,彻底改变了生物钟生物学。此外,这些观察结果导致人们对生物钟组织和紊乱在分子和生理水平上对健康的影响产生了浓厚的兴趣。因此,最近的研究表明,生物钟基因的突变和多态性与糖尿病和肥胖、心血管疾病和癌症有关。在神经行为层面上,生物钟基因也与睡眠障碍、药物和酒精成瘾以及其他精神疾病有关。虽然这些发现经常被描述为揭示了时钟基因的“非生物钟”效应,但实际上这些非生物钟效应很可能是由于细胞和系统节律性丧失所导致的。本综述总结了将生物钟基因与生物行为失调联系起来的证据,并考虑了将多效性时钟基因效应定义为非生物钟的标准。