Suppr超能文献

疑似良性评估后的短间隔随访检查建议:临床实践是否符合 BI-RADS 指南?

Recommendation for short-interval follow-up examinations after a probably benign assessment: is clinical practice consistent with BI-RADS guidance?

机构信息

Group Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Ste 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):1152-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3064.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidance suggests that women with a probably benign finding on mammography receive a management recommendation for short-interval follow-up; historically, radiologists in community practice have not consistently linked this assessment with short-interval follow-up. We evaluated predictors of discordance between probably benign assessments and short-interval follow-up recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We linked data on 196 radiologists who completed a survey on demographic and practice patterns to 15,515 diagnostic mammograms they interpreted with probably benign assessments between 2001 and 2006. Patient characteristics were collected at the time of the mammography. Using logistic regression, we examined whether patient and radiologist characteristics were associated with the odds of short-interval follow-up recommendations (relative to a recommendation for normal follow-up, additional imaging evaluation, or biopsy or surgical consultation).

RESULTS

Overall, 90.9% of mammograms with probably benign findings were recommended for short-interval follow-up; 4.3% were recommended for normal follow-up, 3.0% for additional imaging, and 1.8% for biopsy or surgical consultation. Women with probably benign findings were less likely to receive a short-interval follow-up recommendation if they had extremely dense breasts versus almost entirely fatty breasts (odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.96) or had a breast lump versus no symptoms (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-78). Radiologists were less likely to recommend short-interval follow-up if they had >/= 20 years of experience versus < 10 years of experience (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.90) but more likely if they practiced primarily at an academic medical center versus other institutions (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.14-6.21).

CONCLUSION

In contrast to older studies, the majority of probably benign assessments are now recommended for short-interval follow-up, but the probability of short-interval follow-up recommendations varies by patient and radiologist characteristics.

摘要

目的

美国放射学院 BI-RADS 指南建议,对乳腺 X 线摄影检查显示可能良性的女性,给予短期随访的管理建议;然而,社区实践中的放射科医生并未始终将这一评估与短期随访联系起来。我们评估了可能良性评估与短期随访建议之间不一致的预测因素。

材料与方法

我们将完成了关于人口统计学和实践模式的调查的 196 名放射科医生的数据与他们在 2001 年至 2006 年间解读的 15515 例诊断性乳腺 X 线摄影检查中可能良性的评估结果联系起来。在进行乳腺 X 线摄影检查时收集了患者特征。使用逻辑回归,我们检查了患者和放射科医生特征是否与短期随访建议的可能性相关(相对于正常随访、额外影像学评估、或活检或手术咨询的建议)。

结果

总体而言,90.9%的可能良性发现的乳腺 X 线摄影检查被推荐进行短期随访;4.3%被推荐进行正常随访,3.0%被推荐进行额外影像学检查,1.8%被推荐进行活检或手术咨询。与几乎完全为脂肪性乳房相比,具有致密性乳房的女性不太可能被推荐进行短期随访(比值比 [OR],0.61;95%可信区间 [CI],0.39-0.96),或具有乳房肿块而非无任何症状的女性(OR,0.55;95% CI,0.38-78)。如果放射科医生的经验>20 年而不是<10 年(OR,0.57;95% CI,0.36-0.90),则不太可能推荐短期随访,但如果他们主要在学术医疗中心而不是其他机构行医(OR,2.66;95% CI,1.14-6.21),则更有可能推荐短期随访。

结论

与较旧的研究相比,现在大多数可能良性评估都被推荐进行短期随访,但短期随访建议的可能性因患者和放射科医生的特征而异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Mammographers' perception of women's breast cancer risk.乳腺造影技师对女性乳腺癌风险的认知。
Med Decis Making. 2005 May-Jun;25(3):283-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05276857.
6
Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.诊断性乳腺钼靶摄影的性能基准。
Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):775-90. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2353040738.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验