Department of Clinical Microscopy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2010 Jul;78(4):260-6. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20518.
We have previously developed an alternative approach for undertaking absolute cell counting based upon flow-rate calibration using cell bead (FCB), in which cell bead (CB) can be used as a flow-rate calibration material for generating the absolute microparticle counts. Here, we extended our work of counting CD4+ T-lymphocytes in HIV-infected blood samples with the FCB method.
CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts in EDTA blood samples from 30 healthy subjects and 80 HIV-1-infected patients were determined using TriTEST reagent. The absolute CD4+ T-lymphocytes were measured by FCB, and the results were compared with the absolute counting by commercial latex bead (CLB) or with flow rate-based calibration method (FR). Statistical correlation and agreement were analyzed using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis.
There was no significant difference in the absolute number of CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts enumerated by FCB when compared with those two reference methods (CLB and FR). The absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts obtained from FCB method was highly correlated with those obtained from CLB [r(2)= 0.99, y = 1.04x - 12.37, P < 0.001, and mean bias 11.96 cell/microl, limit of agreement (LOA) -57.82 - 81.74 cell/microl], FR method (r(2) = 0.98; y = 0.97x - 3.13, P < 0.001, and mean bias -24.15 cell/microl, LOA -114.44 - 66.13 cell/microl).
The use of FCB is comparable with the use of CLB and FR. This approach showed the effective in reducing cost for generating the absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts. Such an approach should facilitate and ensure the success of the ongoing antiretroviral therapy program in resource-limited countries.
我们之前开发了一种替代方法,用于基于细胞珠(CB)流速校准进行绝对细胞计数,其中 CB 可作为生成绝对微粒计数的流速校准材料。在此,我们使用 FCB 方法扩展了我们在 HIV 感染血液样本中计数 CD4+T 淋巴细胞的工作。
使用 TriTEST 试剂测定 30 名健康受试者和 80 名 HIV-1 感染患者的 EDTA 血液样本中的 CD4+T 淋巴细胞计数。使用 FCB 测量绝对 CD4+T 淋巴细胞数,并将结果与商用乳胶珠(CLB)或基于流速的校准方法(FR)的绝对计数进行比较。使用线性回归和 Bland-Altman 分析进行统计相关性和一致性分析。
与两种参考方法(CLB 和 FR)相比,FCB 计数的 CD4+T 淋巴细胞绝对数无显著差异。FCB 方法获得的绝对 CD4+T 淋巴细胞计数与 CLB 高度相关[r(2)=0.99,y=1.04x-12.37,P<0.001,平均偏差 11.96 细胞/微升,允许限(LOA)-57.82-81.74 细胞/微升],FR 方法[r(2)=0.98;y=0.97x-3.13,P<0.001,平均偏差-24.15 细胞/微升,LOA-114.44-66.13 细胞/微升]。
FCB 的使用与 CLB 和 FR 相当。这种方法显示出在降低生成绝对 CD4+T 淋巴细胞计数成本方面的有效性。这种方法应该有助于并确保资源有限国家正在进行的抗逆转录病毒治疗计划的成功。