Suppr超能文献

高等灵长类动物颅骨和牙齿变量的种内变异及两性异形及其对人类化石记录的影响。

Intraspecific variation and sexual dimorphism in cranial and dental variables among higher primates and their bearing on the hominid fossil record.

作者信息

Wood B A, Li Y, Willoughby C

机构信息

Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Anat. 1991 Feb;174:185-205.

Abstract

The extent and nature of dental and cranial sexual dimorphisms in extant hominoids have been investigated using reliably sexed samples of Homo sapiens (n = 75), Pan troglodytes (n = 51), Gorilla gorilla (n = 64) and Pongo pygmaeus (n = 43). Seventy nine measurements (35 dental, 16 mandibular and 28 cranial) formed the basis of the study. The patterns of mean differences and dispersions between the taxa were compared across the anatomical regions and the group structures of the separate sex samples were analysed using multivariate (PCA and CVA) analysis. Within and between group variations were compared across the taxa to investigate whether any variables were consistently effective sex or taxonomic discriminators. The study confirmed that there were differences in degree and pattern of sexual dimorphism between the extant higher primates, but the results did not substantiate the distribution of patterns as suggested by Oxnard et al. (1985); in particular there was no evidence of the dispersion differences noted by those authors. There were sufficient consistencies in the behaviour of variables across the four taxa to suggest that all canine dimensions, postcanine crown buccolingual dimensions and mandibular and cranial breadths are generally good sex discriminators, whereas some incisor dimensions, postcanine crown mesiodistal dimensions and facial heights are more effective at discriminating between the four extant taxa included in this study.

摘要

利用智人(n = 75)、黑猩猩(n = 51)、大猩猩(n = 64)和婆罗洲猩猩(n = 43)的可靠性别样本,对现存类人猿牙齿和颅骨的两性异形程度及性质进行了研究。79项测量(35项牙齿、16项下颌骨和28项颅骨)构成了本研究的基础。比较了各分类单元之间平均差异和离散度的模式,并使用多变量(主成分分析和聚类分析)分析了不同性别样本的群体结构。比较了各分类单元内部和之间的变异,以研究是否有任何变量始终是有效的性别或分类鉴别指标。该研究证实,现存高等灵长类动物之间在两性异形的程度和模式上存在差异,但结果并未证实奥克斯纳德等人(1985年)所提出的模式分布;特别是没有证据支持那些作者所指出的离散度差异。四个分类单元中变量的行为有足够的一致性,表明所有犬齿尺寸、犬齿后牙冠颊舌径尺寸以及下颌骨和颅骨宽度通常都是良好的性别鉴别指标,而一些门牙尺寸、犬齿后牙冠近远中径尺寸和面部高度在区分本研究中包含的四个现存分类单元时更有效。

相似文献

2
Size and shape dimorphism in great ape mandibles and implications for fossil species recognition.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Jan;129(1):82-98. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20266.
8
Craniofacial sexual dimorphism patterns and allometry among extant hominids.
Ann Anat. 2004 Dec;186(5-6):471-8. doi: 10.1016/S0940-9602(04)80086-4.
9
Metric variation and sexual dimorphism in the dentition of Ouranopithecus macedoniensis.
J Hum Evol. 2006 Apr;50(4):460-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.11.007. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
10
Sexual dimorphism in the Atapuerca-SH hominids: the evidence from the mandibles.
J Hum Evol. 2002 Apr;42(4):451-74. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2001.0536.

引用本文的文献

2
Evaluating the muscle attachment hypothesis for sagittal cresting in Gorilla and Pongo.
J Anat. 2024 Jun;244(6):995-1006. doi: 10.1111/joa.14018. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
3
A mathematical landmark-based method for measuring worn molars in hominoid systematics.
PeerJ. 2019 May 23;7:e6990. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6990. eCollection 2019.
4
Odontometric sex estimation from clinically extracted molar teeth in a North Indian population sample.
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017 Sep-Dec;9(3):176. doi: 10.4103/jfo.jfds_58_16.
5
Shape analysis of the basioccipital bone in Pax7-deficient mice.
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 20;7(1):17955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18199-9.
6
From Australopithecus to Homo: the transition that wasn't.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 5;371(1698). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0248.
7
Shape covariation between the craniofacial complex and first molars in humans.
J Anat. 2014 Aug;225(2):220-31. doi: 10.1111/joa.12202. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
8
Tooth size variation related to age in Amboseli baboons.
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2010;81(6):348-59. doi: 10.1159/000323588. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
10
The hominin fossil record: taxa, grades and clades.
J Anat. 2008 Apr;212(4):354-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00871.x.

本文引用的文献

1
SEX DETERMINATION BY DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION ANALYSIS OF THE MANDIBLE.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1964 Jun;22(2):129-35. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330220212.
2
Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1963 Mar;21(1):53-68. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330210108.
3
Mesiodistal crown diameters of the deciduous and permanent teeth in individuals.
J Dent Res. 1957 Feb;36(1):39-47. doi: 10.1177/00220345570360011501.
5
Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body weight and canine size in primates.
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1982;37(3-4):163-76. doi: 10.1159/000156031.
6
Sexual dimorphism in early anthropoids.
Nature. 1980 Sep 25;287(5780):328-30. doi: 10.1038/287328a0.
7
New estimates of early hominid body size.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1980 Jan;52(1):52-63. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330520109.
8
Sex determination of Finnish crania by discriminant function analysis.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1966 Jan;24(1):29-33. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330240104.
9
Observations on the teeth of the mountain gorilla (Gorilla gorilla beringei).
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1971 Jan;34(1):85-8. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330340107.
10
Bushman, Hottentot and South African Negro crania studies by distance and discrimination.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1970 Sep;33(2):169-96. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330330204.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验