Balolia Katharine L, Wood Bernard
School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Evol Anthropol. 2025 Mar;34(1):e22052. doi: 10.1002/evan.22052.
Sexual dimorphism is one of the main factors confounding attempts to generate sound alpha taxonomic hypotheses in the early hominin fossil record. To better understand how between-sex variation may confound alpha taxonomic assessments, we consider some of the factors that drive hard-tissue sexual dimorphism in extant primates. We review the socioecological correlates of body size sexual dimorphism, how sexual selection may be associated with craniofacial sexual dimorphism in the context of visual signaling, and how sex-specific patterns of growth and development in primates contribute to intra-specific variation. To illustrate how variation associated with inferred sexual dimorphism has the potential to confound alpha taxonomic assessments in early hominins, we focus on its impact on our understanding of a single taxon, Paranthropus boisei. We suggest that regions of the skeleton likely to be influenced by sexual selection should be avoided when generating alpha taxonomic hypotheses.
两性异形是早期人类化石记录中妨碍得出可靠的α分类学假设的主要因素之一。为了更好地理解性别间变异如何干扰α分类学评估,我们考量了一些驱动现存灵长类动物硬组织两性异形的因素。我们回顾了体型两性异形的社会生态关联因素、在视觉信号背景下性选择如何可能与颅面两性异形相关联,以及灵长类动物特定性别的生长和发育模式如何导致种内变异。为了说明与推断的两性异形相关的变异如何有可能混淆早期人类的α分类学评估,我们重点关注其对我们理解单一分类单元——鲍氏傍人的影响。我们建议,在生成α分类学假设时,应避免骨骼中可能受性选择影响的区域。