Suppr超能文献

[阿魏酸钠治疗糖尿病肾病的系统评价]

[Systematic review on sodium ferulate for treatment of diabetic nephropathy].

作者信息

Yin Hong, Yan Xiang, Yang Ke-hu

机构信息

First Affiliated Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou.

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;29(11):970-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the efficacy and safety of sodium ferulate (SF) for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy.

METHODS

By computerized retrieving the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI, VIP, CBM (theses, conference and internet materials), as well as data from internet materials regarding randomized controlled clinical trials of sodium ferulate for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy were collected completely. Data were strictly extracted using the simple evaluation method recommended in Cochrane Handbook and Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.0 software.

RESULTS

Fourteen randomized controlled trials involving 906 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that as compared with the control group, the effects in SF group were superior in terms of reducing urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) at early stage [WMD = 16.08, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 11.01 to 21.15] and clinical stage (WMD = 82.66, 95% CI: 66.95 to 98.37), urinary endothelin/endothelin-1 (ET/ET-1, WMD = 10.78, 95% CI: 8.18 to 13.39), levels of serum creatinine (SCr, WMD = 6.42, 95% CI: 1.83 to 11.01), blood urea nitrogen (BUN, SMD = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.19 to 2.71) and total cholesterol (TC, WMD = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.21, as well as in increasing high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C, WMD = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.26), showing significant difference between groups. However, the effects of SF were insignificantly different to those of control in reducing fasting blood glucose (FBG, WMD = 0.17, 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.37) and triglyceride (TG, SMD = -0.13, 95% CI -0.49 to 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

At present the evidences show that SF is superior to the conventional treatment in reducing UAER, ET, SCr, BUN, TC and increasing HDL-C, but there is no evidence to show that SF is superior in reducing FBG and TG. However, the evidence is not strong enough due to the low quality of included literature. More large-scale, multi-center, randomized trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of SF in treating diabetic nephropathy.

摘要

目的

系统评价阿魏酸钠(SF)治疗糖尿病肾病的疗效和安全性。

方法

通过计算机检索Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE、中国知网、维普资讯、中国生物医学文献数据库(学位论文、会议及互联网资料),并全面收集互联网资料中有关阿魏酸钠治疗糖尿病肾病的随机对照临床试验数据。按照Cochrane手册推荐的简易评价方法严格提取数据,采用Revman 5.0软件进行Meta分析。

结果

14项涉及906例患者的随机对照试验符合纳入标准。Meta分析显示,与对照组相比,SF组在降低早期尿白蛋白排泄率(UAER)[加权均数差(WMD)=16.08,95%置信区间(95%CI):11.01至21.15]和临床分期(WMD = 82.66,95%CI:66.95至98.37)、尿内皮素/内皮素-1(ET/ET-1,WMD = 10.78,95%CI:8.18至13.39)、血清肌酐水平(SCr,WMD = 6.42,95%CI:1.83至11.01)、血尿素氮(BUN,标准化均数差(SMD)=1.45,95%CI:0.19至2.71)和总胆固醇(TC,WMD = 0.84,95%CI:0.56至1.21)方面效果更优,同时在升高高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C,WMD = 0.17,95%CI:0.09至0.26)方面也有显著差异,组间差异有统计学意义。然而,SF在降低空腹血糖(FBG,WMD = 0.17,95%CI:-0.03至0.37)和甘油三酯(TG,SMD = -0.13,95%CI -0.49至0.23)方面与对照组相比差异无统计学意义。

结论

目前证据表明,SF在降低UAER、ET、SCr、BUN、TC及升高HDL-C方面优于传统治疗,但在降低FBG和TG方面尚无证据显示其更优。然而,由于纳入文献质量较低,证据力度不足。需要更多大规模、多中心的随机试验来证实SF治疗糖尿病肾病的疗效和安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验