Suppr超能文献

超声检测动静脉内瘘流入道狭窄的准确性:一项前瞻性研究的结果

Accuracy of ultrasound in the detection of inflow stenosis of arteriovenous fistulae: results of a prospective study.

作者信息

Salman Loay, Ladino Marco, Alex Manju, Dhamija Rajiv, Merrill Donna, Lenz Oliver, Contreras Gabriel, Asif Arif

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Section of Interventional Nephrology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33136, USA.

出版信息

Semin Dial. 2010 Jan-Feb;23(1):117-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00693.x.

Abstract

While vascular ultrasound (US) has been highlighted to detect vascular access stenosis, its accuracy in the identification of inflow stenosis (IS) (anastomosis and/or juxta-anastomotic area) compared with the gold standard (angiography) has not been evaluated. One hundred three consecutive fistulae referred for interventions were included in this study. Preprocedure US of inflow segment was performed. Angiography from the feeding artery to the right atrium was then conducted. US comparison to angiography in the detection of IS (anastomosis and/or juxta-anastomotic area) was evaluated. Additionally, comparison of US to angiography in the assessment of juxta-anastomotic and anastomotic stenosis was reported separately. Data from 103 patients were available for analysis. Overall, US was negative for IS in 52 cases. Of these, 47 did not show a lesion on angiography. Only five cases demonstrated a stenosis on angiography. Fifty-one cases had IS by US, 50 were confirmed by angiography while one case did not show a lesion on angiography. Consequently, US had a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 98%, and positive and negative predictive values were 98% and 90%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive values for juxta-anastomotic and anastomotic lesions evaluated separately were 92%, 98%, 92%, 98% and 79%, 100%, 95%, 100%, respectively. Linear regression analysis showed a significant positive correlation between US and angiography for anastomotic (r2=0.71, p<0.0001; slope=0.63+/-0.098 and intercept=24+/-6) and juxta-anastomotic stenosis (r2=0.71, p<0.0001; slope=0.68+/-0.060 and intercept=23+/-4). These results reveal that US has a high degree of accuracy in the detection of IS.

摘要

虽然血管超声(US)已被强调用于检测血管通路狭窄,但与金标准(血管造影)相比,其在识别流入道狭窄(IS)(吻合口和/或近吻合口区)方面的准确性尚未得到评估。本研究纳入了103例连续接受干预的动静脉内瘘。术前对流入段进行了超声检查。然后从供血动脉到右心房进行血管造影。评估了超声在检测IS(吻合口和/或近吻合口区)方面与血管造影的对比情况。此外,还分别报告了超声与血管造影在评估近吻合口和吻合口狭窄方面的对比情况。103例患者的数据可供分析。总体而言,52例患者的超声检查显示IS为阴性。其中,47例在血管造影中未显示病变。只有5例在血管造影中显示有狭窄。51例患者的超声检查显示有IS,50例经血管造影证实,1例在血管造影中未显示病变。因此,超声的敏感性为91%,特异性为98%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为98%和90%。分别评估近吻合口和吻合口病变时,其敏感性、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值分别为92%、98%、92%、98%和79%、100%、95%、100%。线性回归分析显示,超声与血管造影在吻合口狭窄(r2 = 0.71,p < 0.0001;斜率 = 0.63±0. / 098,截距 = 24±6)和近吻合口狭窄(r2 = 0.71,p < 0.0001;斜率 = 0.68±0.060,截距 = 23±4)方面存在显著正相关。这些结果表明,超声在检测IS方面具有高度准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验