Emodialisi Borgo Roma-UOC Nefrologia e Dialisi dU, Piazzale LA Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Apr;6(4):819-26. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06220710. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
Guidelines recommend systematically screening for stenosis using various methods, but no studies so far have compared all of the options. A prospective blinded study was performed to compare the performance of several bedside tests performed during dialysis in diagnosing angiographically proven >50% fistula stenosis.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In an unselected population of 119 hemodialysis patients with mature fistulas, physical examination (PE) was conducted; dynamic and derived static venous pressure (VAPR), blood pump flow/arterial pressure (Qb/AP) ratio, recirculation (R), and access blood flow (Qa) were measured; and angiography was performed.
Angiography identified 59 stenotic fistulas: 43 stenoses were located upstream from the venous needle (inflow stenosis), 12 were located downstream (outflow stenosis), and 4 were located at both sites. The optimal tests for identifying an inflow stenosis were Qa < 650 ml/min and the combination of a positive PE "or" Qa < 650 ml/min (accuracy 80% and 81%, respectively), the latter being preferable because it was more sensitive (85% versus 65%, respectively) for a comparable specificity (79% versus 89%, respectively). The best tests for identifying outflow stenosis were PE and VAPR, with no difference between the two (accuracy 91% and 85%, sensitivity 75% and 81%, specificity 93% and 86%, respectively), the former being preferable because it was more reproducible, easier to perform, and applicable to all fistulas.
This study showed that fistula stenosis can be detected and located during dialysis with a moderate-to-excellent accuracy using PE and Qa measurement as screening procedures.
指南建议使用各种方法系统地筛查狭窄,但迄今为止尚无研究比较所有选择。本前瞻性、盲法研究旨在比较几种在透析期间进行的床边检查在诊断血管造影证实的>50%瘘管狭窄方面的表现。
设计、设置、参与者和测量:在 119 名成熟瘘管的未选择的血液透析患者人群中,进行体格检查(PE);测量动态和推导的静脉压力(VAPR)、血液泵流量/动脉压力(Qb/AP)比、再循环(R)和流入血流(Qa);并进行血管造影。
血管造影识别出 59 个狭窄瘘管:43 个狭窄位于静脉针上游(流入狭窄),12 个位于下游(流出狭窄),4 个位于两个部位。用于识别流入狭窄的最佳检查是 Qa<650ml/min 和阳性 PE“或”Qa<650ml/min 的组合(准确性分别为 80%和 81%),后者更敏感(分别为 85%和 65%),但特异性相当(分别为 79%和 89%)。用于识别流出狭窄的最佳检查是 PE 和 VAPR,两者之间没有差异(准确性分别为 91%和 85%,敏感性分别为 75%和 81%,特异性分别为 93%和 86%),前者更可取,因为它更可重复、更容易进行,适用于所有瘘管。
本研究表明,使用 PE 和 Qa 测量作为筛查程序,透析期间可以以中等至良好的准确性检测和定位瘘管狭窄。