School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 May;44(5):844-50. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M526. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
To provide an overview of heterogeneously glycopeptide intermediate Staphylococcus aureus, its epidemiology, methods of diagnosis, and clinical relevance.
Literature was retrieved in December 2009 through Academic Search Premier, Alt-Health Watch, MEDLINE, OVID, and PubMed, using the search terms heterogeneous glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus, hGISA, hVISA, vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus, GISA, and VISA (from 2003 to December 2009). Additional references were obtained through review of publication citations.
All articles retrieved through the literature search and reference review were evaluated for inclusion in this review.
Heterogeneously glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (hGISA) has been shown to significantly complicate treatment for patients with bacteremia and often escapes detection in clinical laboratories. Population analysis profile area under the curve ratio (PAP-AUC) is considered to be the gold standard of hGISA detection; however, it is labor-intensive, expensive, and not feasible in a clinical setting. The Etest macromethod is a reasonable alternative to PAP, yielding high sensitivity and specificity, and has potential for routine use in clinical laboratories. Due to these difficulties in detection, an exact prevalence is difficult to obtain though, based on available data, it appears that approximately 5-15% of isolates display this phenotype. hGISA is associated with prolonged bacteremia, high bacterial load infections, prolonged antibiotic therapy, prolonged hospitalization, treatment failure, and potential for increased mortality.
Overall, hGISA is associated with a poor clinical course in patients with bacteremia. Information is still lacking regarding the actual prevalence of hGISA as well as the extent of its clinical impact. A uniform method of diagnosis must be established in order to better account for all cases of hGISA. More studies must be conducted to assess clinical outcomes of hGISA.
概述异质性糖肽中介金黄色葡萄球菌(hGISA)的流行病学、诊断方法及其临床相关性。
2009 年 12 月,通过学术搜索高级版、替代健康观察、MEDLINE、OVID 和 PubMed 检索文献,使用的检索词为异质性糖肽中介金黄色葡萄球菌、hGISA、hVISA、万古霉素中介金黄色葡萄球菌、GISA 和 VISA(2003 年至 2009 年 12 月)。通过审查出版物引文获得了其他参考文献。
通过文献检索和参考文献回顾获得的所有文章均经过评估,以确定是否纳入本综述。
已证实异质性糖肽中介金黄色葡萄球菌(hGISA)可显著增加菌血症患者的治疗难度,且常逃避临床实验室的检测。人群分析曲线下面积比值(PAP-AUC)被认为是 hGISA 检测的金标准;然而,它劳动强度大、费用高,且在临床环境中不可行。Etest 大方法是 PAP 的合理替代方法,具有高灵敏度和特异性,并且有可能在临床实验室常规使用。由于检测困难,尽管根据现有数据,确切的流行率难以获得,但似乎约有 5-15%的分离株表现出这种表型。hGISA 与延长的菌血症、高细菌负荷感染、延长的抗生素治疗、延长的住院时间、治疗失败以及潜在的死亡率增加有关。
总体而言,hGISA 与菌血症患者的不良临床病程有关。关于 hGISA 的实际流行率及其对临床影响的程度,仍缺乏信息。为了更好地涵盖所有 hGISA 病例,必须建立统一的诊断方法。需要进行更多的研究来评估 hGISA 的临床结果。