Suppr超能文献

经阴道视频辅助胆囊切除术的临床实践。

Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice.

机构信息

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Sana Hospital, Fanningerstr. 32, 10365, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2444-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0983-4. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy with rigid instruments is a new procedure that combines natural orifice surgery (NOS) with classic laparoscopy. This hybrid technique requires conventional laparoscopy via an umbilical incision. To date it is unclear if this procedure is safe and feasible in routine practice.

METHODS

We report on a case series of 128 women who consented to transvaginal cholecystectomy. Data, including visual analog scores (VAS), were collected prospectively via a standard digital spreadsheet. Patients completed satisfaction questionnaires within 10 days after discharge from hospital. We report on outcomes, age, body mass index, operating time, complications, pain scores, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

In 115 (89.8%) patients the procedure was performed as a transvaginal operation. In 11 women (8.6%), we converted to standard laparoscopy, and in 2 cases (1.6%), we converted to an open procedure. Mean age was 52.4 years (range = 23-78 years) and mean body mass index was 27.8 (range = 18.8-42). Mean operating time was 60.6 min (range = 22-110 min). Other procedures were combined with hybrid cholecystectomy in six cases. Complications following transvaginal access included one vaginal bleeding, one perforation of the urinary bladder, and one superficial lesion of the rectum. In one case the hepatic duct had to be stented due to leakage after the procedure via endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Mean VAS on day 1 was 2.26 (± 0.31 SEM) and on day 2 it was 1.53 (± 0.35 SEM). In a postoperative questionnaire, 95% of patients indicated that they would recommend this procedure to other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvaginal cholecystectomy is a safe and easy-to-learn procedure. Possible complications are different than those of standard laparoscopic procedures. Trauma to the abdominal wall and scarring is minimal. Postoperative pain scores were not different than those of standard laparoscopy and a high percentage of patients are satisfied with the procedure.

摘要

背景

经阴道视频辅助胆囊切除术结合了硬性器械,是一种将自然腔道手术(NOS)与经典腹腔镜手术相结合的新技术。该混合技术需要通过脐部切口进行传统腹腔镜检查。迄今为止,尚不清楚该手术在常规实践中是否安全可行。

方法

我们报告了 128 名同意行经阴道胆囊切除术的女性患者的病例系列。通过标准数字电子表格,前瞻性收集数据,包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)。患者在出院后 10 天内完成满意度问卷。我们报告了手术结果、年龄、体重指数、手术时间、并发症、疼痛评分和患者满意度。

结果

在 115 例(89.8%)患者中,手术作为经阴道手术进行。在 11 例(8.6%)患者中,我们转为标准腹腔镜检查,在 2 例(1.6%)患者中,我们转为开放手术。平均年龄为 52.4 岁(范围=23-78 岁),平均体重指数为 27.8(范围=18.8-42)。平均手术时间为 60.6 分钟(范围=22-110 分钟)。其他手术与 6 例混合胆囊切除术相结合。经阴道入路后的并发症包括 1 例阴道出血、1 例膀胱穿孔和 1 例直肠浅表损伤。在 1 例患者中,由于术后通过内镜逆行胰胆管造影术发现漏液,不得不放置肝内胆管支架。术后第 1 天的平均 VAS 为 2.26(±0.31 SEM),第 2 天为 1.53(±0.35 SEM)。在术后问卷调查中,95%的患者表示会向其他患者推荐该手术。

结论

经阴道胆囊切除术是一种安全且易于学习的手术。可能的并发症与标准腹腔镜手术不同。腹壁和疤痕的创伤最小。术后疼痛评分与标准腹腔镜手术无差异,且大部分患者对手术满意。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验