Albes J M
Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center Brandenburg, Bernau, Germany.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Mar;58(2):61-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1240618. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
After almost 20 years aortic root reconstruction modalities have evolved into reasonable and useful surgical measures. Short and long term results match those of aortic composite replacement. Three major restitution strategies have found widespread acceptance: Root replacement with valve reimplantation (David-Procedure), root remodeling (Yacoub-procedure), or commissural resuspension. In the wake of these modalities also isolated aortic valve repair techniques have found renewed interest in order to broaden the indication for reconstructive surgery. Some euphemistic and hence biased interpretation, however, should be considered when looking at the clinical results. Reimplantation and remodeling procedures as well as several valve repair maneuvers are technically demanding unfolding their potential only in the hands of an experienced surgeon. Definite guidelines regarding the appropriate method of restitution required to serve best in the patient's individual situation are not yet at hand although they are about to emerge.
经过近20年的发展,主动脉根部重建方式已演变为合理且实用的手术措施。短期和长期结果与主动脉复合置换术相当。三种主要的修复策略已得到广泛认可:带瓣膜再植入的根部置换术(大卫手术)、根部重塑术(亚库布手术)或瓣叶交界悬吊术。随着这些方式的出现,单纯的主动脉瓣修复技术也重新受到关注,以扩大重建手术的适应症。然而,在审视临床结果时,应考虑一些委婉且有偏向性的解释。再植入和重塑手术以及几种瓣膜修复操作在技术上要求较高,只有经验丰富的外科医生才能发挥其潜力。尽管即将出现,但关于在患者个体情况下最适合的修复方法的明确指南尚未出台。