Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011 May-Jun;21(3):247-61. doi: 10.1038/jes.2010.4. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
Determination of the level of exposure during and after a chemical incident is crucial for the assessment of public health risks and for appropriate medical treatment, as well as for subsequent health studies that may be part of disaster management. Immediately after such an incident, there is usually no opportunity to collect reliable quantitative information on personal exposures and environmental concentrations may fall below detectable levels shortly after the incident has passed. However, many substances persist longer in biological tissues and thus biological monitoring strategies may have the potential to support exposure assessment, as part of health studies, even after the acute phase of a chemical incident is over. Reported successful applications involve very persistent chemical substances such as protein adducts and include those rare cases in which biological tissues were collected within a few hours after an incident. The persistence of a biomarker in biological tissues, the mechanism of toxicity, and the sensitivity of the analysis of a biomarker were identified as the key parameters to support a decision on the feasibility and usefulness of biological monitoring to be applied after an incident involving the release of hazardous chemicals. These input parameters could be retrieved from published methods on applications of biomarkers. Methods for rapid decision making on the usefulness and feasibility of using biological monitoring are needed. In this contribution, a stepwise procedure for taking such a decision is proposed. The persistence of a biomarker in biological tissues, the mechanism of toxicity, and the sensitivity of the analysis of a biomarker were identified as the key parameters to support such a decision. The procedure proposed for decision making is illustrated by case studies based on two documented chemical incidents in the Netherlands.
在化学事故发生期间和之后,确定暴露水平对于评估公共健康风险和进行适当的医疗救治至关重要,同时也对于可能作为灾害管理一部分的后续健康研究至关重要。在这种事故发生后,通常没有机会收集关于个人暴露的可靠定量信息,而且环境浓度可能在事故过去后不久就降至可检测水平以下。然而,许多物质在生物组织中存在的时间更长,因此生物监测策略可能有潜力支持暴露评估,作为健康研究的一部分,即使在化学事故的急性期结束后也是如此。报告的成功应用涉及非常持久的化学物质,如蛋白质加合物,并且包括在事故发生后几个小时内收集生物组织的罕见情况。生物组织中生物标志物的持久性、毒性机制和生物标志物分析的灵敏度被确定为支持在涉及危险化学品释放的事故后应用生物监测的可行性和有用性的决策的关键参数。这些输入参数可以从关于生物标志物应用的已发表方法中检索到。需要快速决策生物监测的有用性和可行性的方法。在本贡献中,提出了一种用于做出此类决策的逐步程序。生物组织中生物标志物的持久性、毒性机制和生物标志物分析的灵敏度被确定为支持此类决策的关键参数。所提出的用于决策的程序通过基于荷兰的两个有文件记录的化学事故的案例研究进行了说明。