Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Basic Res Cardiol. 2010 Jul;105(4):523-33. doi: 10.1007/s00395-010-0095-2. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
Brief periods of ventricular pacing during the early reperfusion phase (pacing-induced postconditioning, PPC) have been shown to reduce infarct size as measured after 2 h of reperfusion. In this study, we investigated (1) whether PPC leads to maintained reduction in infarct size, (2) whether abnormal mechanical load due to asynchronous activation is the trigger for PPC and (3) the signaling pathways that are involved in PPC. Rabbit hearts were subjected to 30 min of coronary occlusion in vivo, followed by 6 weeks of reperfusion. PPC consisted of ten 30-s intervals of left ventricular (LV) pacing, starting at reperfusion. PPC reduced infarct size (TTC staining) normalized to area at risk, from 49.0 +/- 3.3% in control to 22.9 +/- 5.7% in PPC rabbits. In isolated ejecting rabbit hearts, replacing LV pacing by biventricular pacing abolished the protective effect of PPC, whereas ten 30-s periods of high preload provided a protective effect similar to PPC. The protective effect of PPC was neither affected by the adenosine receptor blocker 8-SPT nor by the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan, but was abrogated by the cytoskeletal microtubule-disrupting agent colchicine. Blockers of the mitochondrial K(ATP) channel (5HD), PKC (chelerythrine) and PI3-kinase (wortmannin) all abrogated the protection provided by PPC. In the in situ pig heart, PPC reduced infarct size from 35 +/- 4 to 16 +/- 12%, a protection which was abolished by the stretch-activated channel blocker gadolinium. No infarct size reduction was achieved if PPC application was delayed by 5 min or if only five pacing cycles were used. The present study indicates that (1) PPC permanently reduces myocardial injury, (2) abnormal mechanical loading is a more likely trigger for PPC than electrical stimulation or G-coupled receptor stimulation and (3) PPC may share downstream pathways with other modes of cardioprotection.
在再灌注早期(起搏后处理,PPC)短暂的心室起搏已被证明可减少再灌注 2 小时后测量的梗塞面积。在这项研究中,我们研究了:(1)PPC 是否导致梗塞面积持续减少;(2)由于异步激活导致的异常机械负荷是否是 PPC 的触发因素;(3)涉及 PPC 的信号通路。兔心脏在体内经历 30 分钟的冠状动脉闭塞,随后进行 6 周的再灌注。PPC 由左心室(LV)起搏的十个 30 秒间隔组成,从再灌注开始。PPC 将梗塞面积(TTC 染色)相对于危险区域归一化,从对照兔的 49.0 +/- 3.3%减少到 PPC 兔的 22.9 +/- 5.7%。在分离的射血兔心脏中,用双心室起搏代替 LV 起搏消除了 PPC 的保护作用,而十个 30 秒的高前负荷期提供了类似于 PPC 的保护作用。PPC 的保护作用不受腺苷受体阻滞剂 8-SPT 或血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂坎地沙坦的影响,但被微管破坏剂秋水仙碱所阻断。线粒体 K(ATP)通道(5HD)、PKC(Chelerythrine)和 PI3-激酶(wortmannin)的阻断剂均消除了 PPC 提供的保护作用。在原位猪心脏中,PPC 将梗塞面积从 35 +/- 4 减少到 16 +/- 12%,这种保护作用被伸展激活通道阻滞剂钆所消除。如果 PPC 应用延迟 5 分钟或仅使用五个起搏周期,则不会减少梗塞面积。本研究表明:(1)PPC 永久性地减少心肌损伤;(2)异常的机械负荷比电刺激或 G 偶联受体刺激更可能是 PPC 的触发因素;(3)PPC 可能与其他心肌保护模式共享下游途径。