Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2626-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0966-5. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
External dissection of Calot's triangle and the gallbladder associated with complete cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard technique to achieve a safe cholecystectomy. However, in severe acute or chronic cholecystitis, the laparoscopic application of this standard technique may be technically difficult, with an increased risk of bile duct injury, even in the hands of an experienced surgeon.
In a consecutive series of 552 cholecystectomies, 39 patients (7.1%) with difficult local conditions within Calot's triangle, such as gangrenous cholecystitis (three patients), severe scleroatrophic cholecystitis with or without anomalous right hepatic duct (24 and 10 patients, respectively), or Mirizzi syndrome (seven patients), underwent a routine exclusive "endovesicular approach" as an alternative to dissection of Calot's triangle prior to further subtotal cholecystectomy. All patients were examined by control cholangiography 3 months postoperatively to confirm the safety of the technique.
The operation was well tolerated by all patients with only 15.4% minor complications. Intraoperative cholangiography was feasible in 79.5%. There were no postoperative biliary or infectious complications. At 4.3 months follow-up, all patients were symptom-free, except for two patients (5.1%) with residual common bile duct stones which were successfully treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy.
An endovesicular approach for gallbladder dissection followed by subtotal cholecystectomy is a safe alternative to the classic Calot's dissection in the case of severe cholecystitis or difficult local conditions. This technique is recommended as an attractive solution to prevent bile duct injury, particularly when severe inflammation is associated to extrahepatic anatomic variants of the biliary tree.
外解剖胆囊三角和胆囊与完整的胆囊切除术被认为是实现安全胆囊切除术的金标准技术。然而,在严重的急性或慢性胆囊炎中,腹腔镜应用这种标准技术可能在技术上具有挑战性,即使在经验丰富的外科医生手中,也有增加胆管损伤的风险。
在连续 552 例胆囊切除术患者中,39 例(7.1%)胆囊三角局部条件困难,如坏疽性胆囊炎(3 例)、严重硬化萎缩性胆囊炎伴或不伴异常右肝管(分别为 24 例和 10 例)或 Mirizzi 综合征(7 例),采用常规的“腔内入路”作为三角解剖前进一步行次全胆囊切除术的替代方法。所有患者均在术后 3 个月行控制性胆管造影检查,以确认该技术的安全性。
所有患者均能耐受手术,仅有 15.4%的患者发生轻微并发症。术中胆管造影可行率为 79.5%。无术后胆道或感染性并发症。4.3 个月随访时,所有患者均无症状,除 2 例(5.1%)患者残留胆总管结石,经内镜括约肌切开术成功治疗。
在严重胆囊炎或局部条件困难的情况下,腔内胆囊切除术加次全胆囊切除术是经典胆囊三角解剖的一种安全替代方法。当严重炎症与肝外胆道解剖变异相关时,这种技术被推荐为预防胆管损伤的一种有吸引力的解决方案。