Soleimani Mehrdad, Mehrabi Arianeb, Mood Zhoobin A, Fonouni Hamidreza, Kashfi Arash, Büchler Markus W, Schmidt Jan
Department of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Am Surg. 2007 May;73(5):498-507.
Partial cholecystectomy (PC) is an alternative choice to standard cholecystectomy in situations with increased risk of Calot's components injury. We reported our experience with the patients treated with PC and reviewed the literature. Fifty-four patients with complex acute cholecystitis underwent PC, including conventional partial cholecystectomy (CPC; n = 48) and laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy (LPC; n = 6). The clinical diagnosis was verified by ultrasonography. In addition, we reviewed 1190 published cases (1972-2005) who underwent a "nonconventional" surgery for severe cholecystitis, including cholecystostomy, CPC, or LPC. Review of the literature, including our cases, showed a male:female ratio of 1.3:1. The major operative indication was severe acute cholecystitis. Procedures included cholecystostomy (65.8%) and PC (34.2%). In the follow-up (n = 1190), biliary leak (4.8%), retained stones (4.6%), recurrent symptoms (2.3%), wound infections (1.9%), persistent biliary fistula (0.9%), and prolonged biliary drainage (0.2%) were found, with an overall mortality rate of 9.4 per cent. In 133 patients, because of postoperative complications (e.g., recurrent symptoms, remaining common bile duct stones, or persistence of bile fistula), reoperation was necessary, including 121 cases (90.1%) of cholecystectomy, whereas the other 11 patients underwent other procedures such as common bile duct exploration or closure of the fistula. The surgical trend for complex acute cholecystitis treatment has been changed from only cholecystostomy to a spectrum of cholecystostomy, CPC, and LPC with the progressive increase of PC. The proportion of the LPC compared with CPC has also increased during recent years. It seems that PC is a safe procedure for treating complicated acute cholecystitis. Whether the indication and need for alternative techniques to standard cholecystectomy is changing should be evaluated in future studies.
在胆囊三角区结构损伤风险增加的情况下,部分胆囊切除术(PC)是标准胆囊切除术的一种替代选择。我们报告了我们对接受PC治疗的患者的经验并回顾了相关文献。54例复杂性急性胆囊炎患者接受了PC,包括传统部分胆囊切除术(CPC;n = 48)和腹腔镜部分胆囊切除术(LPC;n = 6)。临床诊断通过超声检查得以证实。此外,我们回顾了1972年至2005年间接受“非常规”严重胆囊炎手术的1190例已发表病例,包括胆囊造瘘术、CPC或LPC。对包括我们病例在内的文献回顾显示,男女比例为1.3:1。主要手术指征为严重急性胆囊炎。手术方式包括胆囊造瘘术(65.8%)和PC(34.2%)。在随访(n = 1190)中,发现胆漏(4.8%)、残留结石(4.6%)、复发症状(2.3%)、伤口感染(1.9%)、持续性胆瘘(0.9%)和延长的胆汁引流(0.2%),总死亡率为9.4%。在133例患者中,由于术后并发症(如复发症状、残留胆总管结石或胆瘘持续存在),需要再次手术,其中包括121例(90.1%)胆囊切除术,而其他11例患者接受了诸如胆总管探查或瘘管闭合等其他手术。随着PC的逐渐增加,复杂性急性胆囊炎的手术治疗趋势已从仅行胆囊造瘘术转变为包括胆囊造瘘术、CPC和LPC的一系列手术方式。近年来,LPC与CPC相比的比例也有所增加。看来PC是治疗复杂性急性胆囊炎的一种安全手术方式。标准胆囊切除术替代技术的指征和需求是否正在发生变化,应在未来研究中进行评估。