Reisman E M, Kennedy T J, Roehrborn C G, McConnell J D
Division of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
J Urol. 1991 Jun;145(6):1186-9; discussion 1189-91. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38570-1.
In this study 171 consecutive patients hospitalized for prostatectomy were prospectively evaluated by urologist-performed transabdominal ultrasound. The urologist-sonographers were blinded to the results of an excretory urogram (IVP) performed and interpreted by radiologists. All significant upper tract pathology (4 renal cell carcinomas and 1 transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis) identified by an IVP also was detected by ultrasonography. Of 5 clinically silent stones seen on an IVP 4 were identified by sonography. There were 13 patients (7.6%) with severe contrast medium allergies or renal failure who were readily evaluated with ultrasonography. Urologist-performed sonography can safely replace an IVP for routine evaluation of the urinary tract before prostatectomy. Moreover, sonography provided significant additional data on prostate size and post-void residual. However, the cost-effectiveness of upper tract imaging in patients before prostatectomy may be questioned.
在本研究中,171例因前列腺切除术住院的连续患者接受了由泌尿科医生进行的经腹超声前瞻性评估。泌尿外科超声检查医师对放射科医生进行并解读的排泄性尿路造影(IVP)结果不知情。IVP发现的所有重要上尿路病变(4例肾细胞癌和1例肾盂移行细胞癌)也通过超声检查检测到。IVP上发现的5例临床无症状结石中,4例通过超声检查得以识别。有13例(7.6%)患者有严重的造影剂过敏或肾衰竭,超声检查可对其进行轻松评估。泌尿科医生进行的超声检查可安全替代IVP,用于前列腺切除术前尿路的常规评估。此外,超声检查还提供了有关前列腺大小和排尿后残余尿量的重要额外数据。然而,前列腺切除术前患者上尿路成像的成本效益可能受到质疑。