Département de philosophie, université Paris-Ouest-Nanterre-La-Défense, Nanterre, France.
C R Biol. 2010 Feb;333(2):119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2009.11.012. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
Focusing on "The Orchids," this article aims at disentangling the concepts of teleology, design and natural theology. It refers to several contemporary critics of Darwin (Kölliker, Argyll, Royer, Candolle, Delpino) to challenge Huxley's interpretation that Darwin's system was "a deathblow" to teleology. "The Orchids" seems rather to be a "flank-movement" (Gray): it departs from the Romantic theories of transmutation and the "imaginary examples" of the Origin; it focuses on empirical data and on teleological structures. Although Darwin refers to natural selection, his readers mock him for his fascination for delicate morphological contrivances and co-adaptations - a sign that he was inescapably lured to finality. Some even suggested that his system was a "theodicy". In the history of Darwinism, "The Orchids" reveals "another" quite unexpected and heterodox Darwin: freed from the hypothetical fancies of the Origin, and even suggesting a new kind of physico-theology.
本文聚焦于《兰花》一书,旨在厘清目的论、设计论和自然神学等概念。文中提到了几位达尔文的当代批评者(科尔利克、阿盖尔、罗耶、德坎多勒、德尔皮诺),以质疑赫胥黎的观点,即达尔文的理论体系是“对目的论的致命一击”。《兰花》更像是一次“侧翼行动”(格雷语):它背离了浪漫主义的变异理论和《物种起源》中的“虚构例子”,转而专注于经验数据和目的论结构。尽管达尔文提到了自然选择,但他的读者却嘲笑他对微妙形态设计和协同适应的着迷——这表明他不可避免地被目的论所吸引。甚至有人认为他的理论体系是一种“神正论”。在达尔文主义的历史中,《兰花》揭示了“另一个”出人意料、颇为异端的达尔文:他摆脱了《物种起源》中假设性的奇思妙想,甚至提出了一种新的物理神学。