Fresenius Medical Care North America, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 May;5(5):856-66. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07161009. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for defining causal inferences but are sometimes not feasible because of cost, ethical, or time considerations. We explored the accuracy and potential use of a "simulated trial" through the modeling of a previously published RCT, Die Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse Studie (4D Study), a landmark study that investigated the cardiovascular benefit of atorvastatin use in 1255 patients with ESRD.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Using a large historical database of interventions and outcomes in dialysis patients, we conducted an observational model of the 4D Study in dialysis patients who had type 2 diabetes and were prescribed a statin (5144 patients) and matched to a non-statin user (5144 control subjects) before multivariate modeling. Inclusion, exclusion, and outcome parameters of the study, as prespecified by the 4D Study, were strictly modeled in this analysis.
In covariate- and propensity-adjusted Cox regression, statin use (versus nonuse) was associated with a decrease in the composite primary outcome of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. Statin use was also associated with a decrease in cardiovascular mortality and all cardiac events combined. The hazard ratios in this observational model were numerically comparable to the hazard ratios reported in the 4D Study; however, because of the larger number of patients "enrolled," results in this simulated study achieved statistical significance.
Statin use was associated with some cardiovascular benefit in a simulated trial of patients with ESRD; however, the size of benefit was considerably smaller than that seen in the general population. Such simulated trials may represent an exploratory, cost-effective option when RCTs are not immediately feasible.
随机对照试验(RCT)是确定因果关系的金标准,但由于成本、伦理或时间等方面的考虑,有时并不可行。我们通过对以前发表的 RCT——德国糖尿病透析研究(4D 研究)进行建模,探索了“模拟试验”的准确性和潜在用途。该 RCT 研究了在 1255 名终末期肾病患者中使用阿托伐他汀的心血管获益。
设计、设置、参与者和测量:利用透析患者干预和结局的大型历史数据库,我们对接受他汀类药物治疗的 2 型糖尿病透析患者进行了 4D 研究的观察性模型,共有 5144 名患者被处方他汀类药物(5144 例),并与未使用他汀类药物的患者(5144 例对照)进行了多元模型匹配。本分析严格按照 4D 研究的规定对研究的纳入、排除和结局参数进行建模。
在协变量和倾向评分调整的 Cox 回归中,与非他汀类药物使用者相比,他汀类药物使用者的复合主要结局(包括心脏死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和中风)有所下降。他汀类药物使用者的心血管死亡率和所有心脏事件的发生率也有所下降。该观察性模型中的风险比与 4D 研究报告的风险比数值上相当;然而,由于患者数量较多,本模拟研究的结果达到了统计学意义。
在终末期肾病患者的模拟试验中,他汀类药物的使用与某些心血管获益相关;然而,获益的幅度明显小于一般人群。在无法立即进行 RCT 时,此类模拟试验可能是一种探索性、具有成本效益的选择。