Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center, University of California at San Francisco, 5858 Horton Street Suite 200, Emeryville, CA 94698, USA.
Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Apr;31(7):1312-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07153.x. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
The dorsal striatum (DS) has been implicated in instrumental learning but its role in the acquisition of stimulus-driven behaviour is not clear. To explore the contribution of the DS to both response-outcome (R-O) and stimulus-outcome (S-O) associative learning, we pharmacologically inactivated subregions (dorsolateral, anterior dorsomedial and posterior dorsomedial) of the DS during acquisition sessions in which subjects acquired two unique, novel R-O pairs or two unique, novel S-O pairs. To test whether specific R-O or S-O associations were learned under inactivation, rats were tested following selective-satiety devaluation of one outcome under drug-free conditions. In the instrumental task, control rats and rats with dorsolateral striatum (DLS) inactivation during learning responded less on the lever that had earned the devalued outcome than on the alternative lever at test, indicating that the DLS is not critical for the formation of R-O associations. In contrast, rats with inactivation of the medial DS (DMS) (either anterior or posterior) during learning responded indiscriminately, suggesting failure to acquire the novel R-O associations. In the Pavlovian task, both controls and rats with anterior DMS inactivation during learning responded less in the presence of the stimulus predicting the devalued outcome, whereas rats with DLS or posterior DMS inactivation during learning responded equally to the stimuli, indicating that they had not acquired the novel S-O associations. These data confirm that the DLS and anterior region DMS mediate different aspects of reward-related learning, and suggest that the posterior DMS may mediate a function common to both forms of learning (R-O and S-O). Finally, we demonstrate that both S-O and R-O associations are required for selective Pavlovian-instrumental transfer.
背侧纹状体(DS)被认为与工具性学习有关,但它在刺激驱动行为的获得中的作用尚不清楚。为了探讨 DS 对反应-结果(R-O)和刺激-结果(S-O)联想学习的贡献,我们在获得阶段通过药理学方法使 DS 的子区域(背外侧、前背内侧和后背内侧)失活,在此期间,实验对象学习了两个独特的、新的 R-O 对或两个独特的、新的 S-O 对。为了测试在失活条件下是否学习了特定的 R-O 或 S-O 关联,我们在无药物条件下对一个结果进行选择性饱食减值后,对大鼠进行了测试。在工具任务中,对照组大鼠和在学习过程中 DS 背外侧(DLS)失活的大鼠在测试时,对获得减值结果的杠杆的反应少于对替代杠杆的反应,这表明 DLS 对于 R-O 关联的形成不是关键的。相比之下,在学习过程中 DMS(内侧 DS)(前侧或后侧)失活的大鼠反应无差别,表明未能获得新的 R-O 关联。在巴甫洛夫任务中,在学习过程中前侧 DMS 失活的对照组和大鼠对预测减值结果的刺激的反应都减少了,而在学习过程中 DLS 或后侧 DMS 失活的大鼠对刺激的反应则相等,这表明它们没有获得新的 S-O 关联。这些数据证实 DLS 和前侧 DMS 介导了与奖励相关学习的不同方面,并表明后侧 DMS 可能介导了两种形式的学习(R-O 和 S-O)共有的功能。最后,我们证明选择性的巴甫洛夫-工具转移需要 S-O 和 R-O 关联。