• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科的高频使用者:误区、数据和政策含义。

Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.032. Epub 2010 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.032
PMID:20346540
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Frequent emergency department (ED) users have been the targets of health care reform proposals and hospital crowding interventions, but it is not clear that common assumptions about this group are supported by data. We review the literature pertaining to frequent ED users, their demographics, acuity of illness, and patterns of health care utilization. We seek to inform development of policies directed at frequent ED use and to highlight potential related challenges.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature on frequent ED users was performed.

RESULTS

Frequent users comprise 4.5% to 8% of all ED patients but account for 21% to 28% of all visits. Most frequent ED users are white and insured; public insurance is overrepresented. Age is bimodal, with peaks in the group aged 25 to 44 years and older than 65 years. On average, these patients have higher acuity complaints and are at greater risk for hospitalization than occasional ED users. However, the opposite may be true of the highest-frequency ED users. Frequent users are also heavy users of other parts of the health care system. Only a minority of frequent ED users remain in this group long term. Complaints vary with age, location, and usage patterns.

CONCLUSION

Frequent ED users are a heterogeneous group along many dimensions and defy popular assumptions. The subgroups have not yet been sufficiently defined to allow clearly directed policy design, and many frequent users present with true medical needs, which may explain why existing attempts to address the phenomena have had mixed success at best.

摘要

研究目的

频繁使用急诊部(ED)的患者一直是医疗改革提案和医院拥挤干预措施的目标,但目前尚不清楚针对这一群体的常见假设是否得到数据支持。我们回顾了与频繁使用 ED 的患者、他们的人口统计学、疾病严重程度和医疗保健利用模式相关的文献。我们旨在为针对频繁使用 ED 的政策制定提供信息,并强调潜在的相关挑战。

方法

对频繁使用 ED 的患者的文献进行了系统回顾。

结果

频繁使用者占所有 ED 患者的 4.5%至 8%,但占所有就诊的 21%至 28%。大多数频繁使用 ED 的患者是白人且有保险;公共保险的占比过高。年龄呈双峰分布,峰值在 25 至 44 岁和 65 岁以上的人群中。平均而言,这些患者的病情严重程度较高,住院风险高于偶尔使用 ED 的患者。然而,对于最高频率使用 ED 的患者则可能相反。频繁使用者也是医疗保健系统其他部分的重度使用者。只有少数频繁使用 ED 的患者长期处于这一群体中。投诉随年龄、地点和使用模式而异。

结论

频繁使用 ED 的患者是一个在多个维度上存在异质性的群体,与普遍的假设相悖。亚组尚未得到充分定义,无法进行明确的政策设计,并且许多频繁使用 ED 的患者确实存在医疗需求,这可能解释了为什么现有的解决这些问题的尝试最多只能取得部分成功的原因。

相似文献

1
Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications.急诊科的高频使用者:误区、数据和政策含义。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.032. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
5
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
9
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.COVID-19 患者使用激素避孕的血栓栓塞风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Screening Algorithm to Predict High-Risk Hepatitis C Infection.一种基于机器学习的用于预测丙型肝炎高风险感染的筛查算法的开发与验证
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Aug 15;12(8):ofaf496. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf496. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Association of Mental Health Disorders and Social Determinants of Health with Frequent Emergency Department Use.心理健康障碍及健康的社会决定因素与频繁使用急诊科的关联
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 18;26(4):905-917. doi: 10.5811/westjem.35599.
3
Pain Intensity and Health Service Utilization in United States Adults with Pain: A Cross-Sectional Database Analysis.
美国疼痛成年人的疼痛强度与医疗服务利用情况:一项横断面数据库分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 11;13(14):1678. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141678.
4
Spread and Scale-Up of a Region-Wide Telehealth Navigation Service in a Rural Context: Qualitative Process Evaluation.农村地区全区域远程医疗导航服务的推广与扩大:定性过程评估
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 23;27:e64734. doi: 10.2196/64734.
5
Predicting emergency department visits for non-traumatic dental-related conditions among Medicaid beneficiaries.预测医疗补助受益人群中与非创伤性牙科相关疾病的急诊就诊情况。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 6;15(1):19872. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04764-0.
6
Optimizing Emergency Department Patient Flow Through Bed Allocation Strategies: A Discrete-Event Simulation Study.通过床位分配策略优化急诊科患者流程:一项离散事件模拟研究。
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251335799. doi: 10.1177/00469580251335799. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
7
Identifying drivers of emergency department overutilization following bariatric surgery: insights from the MBSAQIP.确定减肥手术后急诊科过度使用的驱动因素:来自MBSAQIP的见解。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Jun;21(6):662-670. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.01.004. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
8
Pre-Assault Diagnoses Associated with Post-Assault Emergency Department Visits After Recent Sexual Assault.近期性侵犯后与性侵后急诊科就诊相关的性侵前诊断
J Child Sex Abus. 2025 Jan 29:1-20. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2025.2457149.
9
Profiles of physician follow-up care, correlates and outcomes among patients affected by an incident mental disorder.新发精神障碍患者的医生随访护理情况、相关因素及结局
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jan 11;26(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02674-0.
10
Is frequent emergency department use a complement or substitute for other healthcare services? Evidence from South Carolina Medicaid enrollees.频繁使用急诊科是对其他医疗服务的补充还是替代?来自南卡罗来纳州医疗补助受益人的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2025 Jun;60(3):e14430. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14430. Epub 2025 Jan 2.