Suppr超能文献

比较长期血液透析患者的身体成分评估测试。

Comparing body composition assessment tests in long-term hemodialysis patients.

机构信息

Harold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 May;55(5):885-96. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.12.031. Epub 2010 Mar 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Protein-energy wasting is common in chronic kidney disease and is associated with decreases in body muscle and fat stores and poor outcomes. The accuracy and reliability of field methods to measure body composition is unknown in this population.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 118 maintenance hemodialysis patients were seen at the General Clinical Research Center at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA.

INDEX TESTS

Triceps skinfold, near-infrared interactance, and bioelectrical impedance analysis using the Segal, Kushner, and Lukaski equations.

REFERENCE TEST

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

RESULTS

Participants (42% women, 52% with diabetes, 40% African Americans, and 38% Hispanics) were aged 49.4 +/- 11.5 (mean +/- SD) years, and had undergone dialysis therapy for 41.1 +/- 32.9 months. Body mass index was 27.0 +/- 6.0 kg/m(2). Using DEXA as the reference test, the bioelectrical impedance analysis-Kushner equation, triceps skinfold, and near-infrared interactance were most accurate of the index tests in estimating total-body fat percentage, whereas bioelectrical impedance analysis-Segal equation and bioelectrical impedance analysis-Lukaski equation overestimated total body fat percentage. Bland-Altman analyses and difference plots showed that bioelectrical impedance analysis-Kushner and near-infrared interactance were most similar to the reference test. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-Kushner, triceps skinfold, and near-infrared interactance had the smallest mean differences from DEXA, especially in women (1.6%, 0.7%, and 1.2%, respectively). Similar results were observed in African American participants (n = 47).

LIMITATIONS

Measurements were performed 1 day after a hemodialysis treatment, leading to more fluid retention, which may have affected the reference and index tests differently.

CONCLUSIONS

Using DEXA as the reference test, both near-infrared interactance and bioelectrical impedance analysis-Kushner method yield more consistent estimates of total body fat percentage in maintenance hemodialysis patients compared with the other index tests. Near-infrared interactance is not affected by skin color. Field methods with portable devices may provide adequate precision.

摘要

背景

在慢性肾脏病中,蛋白质-能量消耗很常见,与身体肌肉和脂肪储存减少以及不良预后有关。在该人群中,测量身体成分的现场方法的准确性和可靠性尚不清楚。

研究设计

横断面观察性研究。

地点和参与者

在加利福尼亚州托伦斯市的 Harbor-UCLA 医疗中心的一般临床研究中心,对 118 名维持性血液透析患者进行了观察。

索引测试

肱三头肌皮褶厚度、近红外相互作用和使用 Segal、Kushner 和 Lukaski 方程的生物电阻抗分析。

参考测试

双能 X 射线吸收法(DEXA)。

结果

参与者(42%为女性,52%患有糖尿病,40%为非裔美国人,38%为西班牙裔)年龄为 49.4 +/- 11.5(平均值 +/- SD)岁,接受透析治疗 41.1 +/- 32.9 个月。体重指数为 27.0 +/- 6.0 kg/m2。使用 DEXA 作为参考测试,生物电阻抗分析-Kushner 方程、肱三头肌皮褶厚度和近红外相互作用在估计全身脂肪百分比方面比指数测试更准确,而生物电阻抗分析-Segal 方程和生物电阻抗分析-Lukaski 方程则高估了全身脂肪百分比。Bland-Altman 分析和差值图显示,生物电阻抗分析-Kushner 和近红外相互作用与参考测试最相似。生物电阻抗分析-Kushner、肱三头肌皮褶厚度和近红外相互作用与 DEXA 的平均差异最小,尤其是女性(分别为 1.6%、0.7%和 1.2%)。在非裔美国参与者(n = 47)中也观察到类似的结果。

局限性

测量是在血液透析治疗后 1 天进行的,这导致更多的液体潴留,这可能会对参考和指数测试产生不同的影响。

结论

使用 DEXA 作为参考测试,与其他指数测试相比,近红外相互作用和生物电阻抗分析-Kushner 方法在维持性血液透析患者中更能一致地估计全身脂肪百分比。近红外相互作用不受肤色影响。带有便携式设备的现场方法可能具有足够的精度。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Assessment of uremic sarcopenia in dialysis patients: An update.透析患者尿毒症性肌肉减少症的评估:最新进展
Tzu Chi Med J. 2021 Jul 16;34(2):182-191. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_254_20. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
9
Obesity Paradox in Advanced Kidney Disease: From Bedside to the Bench.晚期肾病中的肥胖悖论:从床边到实验台。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Jul-Aug;61(2):168-181. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验