Suppr超能文献

评估从人胰岛素强化治疗转换为类似物胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制和胰岛素使用量的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

Evaluating the Impact of Intensifying Treatment from Human to Analogue Insulin on Glycaemic Control and Insulin Expenditure in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Hussin Siti Aisyah, Mohamad Nur Aimi, Othman Mohd Khairi, Wan Mohamed Wan Mohd Izani

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia.

出版信息

Malays J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;31(2):159-169. doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.2.14. Epub 2024 Apr 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Achieving good glycaemic control is essential to reducing the risk of diabetes complications. Insulin is the most effective therapy for achieving good glycaemic control; however, it is associated with a higher risk of hypoglycaemia, especially with human insulin. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intensification from human to analogue insulin and its added cost.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at the Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM). Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who underwent intensification for at least 3 months from human to analogue insulin were included in this study. The patients' medical records, haemoglobin A1c (Hba1c) and fasting blood sugar (FBS) were retrieved. The total cost pre- and post-intensification of insulin was obtained from the pharmacy database. Differences in HbA1c, FBS and total insulin cost pre- and post-intensification were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients with T2DM who had intensification from human to analogue insulin were included in this study. HbA1c and FBS levels were significantly lower in analogue insulin. However, the differences were not clinically significant, as the mean reduction in HbA1c was less than 0.5%. Meanwhile, the total costs of analogue insulin for 3 months were higher.

CONCLUSION

There were no clinically significant improvements in patients' HbA1c and FBS after the intensification of insulin, despite the extra costs spent. Hence, it is vital to choose the right group of patients to receive an insulin analogue to maximise its benefit but at the most optimal cost.

摘要

背景

实现良好的血糖控制对于降低糖尿病并发症风险至关重要。胰岛素是实现良好血糖控制最有效的疗法;然而,它与低血糖风险较高相关,尤其是人胰岛素。本研究旨在评估从人胰岛素强化为类似物胰岛素的疗效及其额外成本。

方法

本回顾性研究在马来西亚理科大学医院(HUSM)进行。纳入了从人胰岛素强化为类似物胰岛素至少3个月的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者。检索患者的病历、糖化血红蛋白(Hba1c)和空腹血糖(FBS)。从药房数据库获取胰岛素强化前后的总成本。分析强化前后HbA1c、FBS和胰岛素总成本的差异。

结果

本研究共纳入163例从人胰岛素强化为类似物胰岛素的T2DM患者。类似物胰岛素组的HbA1c和FBS水平显著更低。然而,差异无临床意义,因为HbA1c的平均降幅小于0.5%。同时,3个月类似物胰岛素的总成本更高。

结论

尽管增加了成本,但胰岛素强化后患者的HbA1c和FBS并无临床显著改善。因此,选择合适的患者群体接受胰岛素类似物以最大化其益处同时达到最优成本至关重要。

相似文献

8
Treatment of periodontal disease for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者控制血糖的牙周疾病治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 6;2015(11):CD004714. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004714.pub3.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验