Suppr超能文献

排放标準与内标準在评估城市排水对短暂性受纳水体影响的应用比较。

Emission standards versus immission standards for assessing the impact of urban drainage on ephemeral receiving water bodies.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Idraulica ed Applicazioni Ambientali, Università di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2010;61(6):1617-29. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.887.

Abstract

In the past, emission standard indicators have been adopted by environmental regulation authorities in order to preserve the quality of a receiving water body. Such indicators are based on the frequency or magnitude of a polluted discharge that may be continuous or intermittent. In order to properly maintain the quality of receiving waters, the Water Framework Directive, following the basic ideas of British Urban Pollution Manual, has been established. The Directive has overtaken the emission-standard concept, substituting it with the stream-standard concept that fixes discharge limits for each polluting substance depending on the self-depurative characteristics of receiving waters. Stream-standard assessment requires the deployment of measurement campaigns that can be very expensive; furthermore, the measurement campaigns are usually not able to provide a link between the receiving water quality and the polluting sources. Therefore, it would be very useful to find a correlation between the quality status of the natural waters and the emission-based indicators. Thus, this study is aimed to finding a possible connection between the receiving water quality indicators drawn by environmental regulation authorities and emission-based indicators while considering both continuous (i.e. from the wastewater treatment plants) and intermittent pollution discharges (mainly from combined sewer overflows). Such research has been carried out by means of long-term analysis adopting a holistic modelling approach. The different parts of the integrated urban drainage system were modelled by a parsimonious integrated model. The analysis was applied to an ephemeral river bounding Bologna (Italy). The study concluded that the correlation between receiving water quality and polluting emissions cannot be generally stated. Nevertheless, specific analyses on polluting emissions were pointed out in the study highlighting cause-effect link between polluting sources and receiving water quality.

摘要

过去,环境监管机构采用排放标准指标来保护受纳水体的质量。这些指标基于可能连续或间歇的污染排放的频率或幅度。为了正确维护受纳水的质量,水框架指令遵循英国城市污染手册的基本思想,已经建立。该指令已经取代了排放标准概念,取而代之的是溪流标准概念,该概念根据受纳水的自净化特性为每种污染物质固定排放限值。溪流标准评估需要部署可能非常昂贵的测量活动;此外,测量活动通常无法在受纳水质量和污染源之间建立联系。因此,在受纳水水质和基于排放的指标之间找到相关性将非常有用。因此,本研究旨在寻找环境监管机构制定的受纳水水质指标与基于排放的指标之间可能的联系,同时考虑连续(即来自污水处理厂)和间歇污染排放(主要来自合流污水溢流)。通过采用整体建模方法进行了长期分析来进行这项研究。通过一个简洁的综合模型对综合城市排水系统的不同部分进行建模。该分析应用于博洛尼亚(意大利)边界的一条短暂河流。研究得出的结论是,受纳水水质与污染排放之间的相关性不能一概而论。然而,研究中指出了对污染排放的具体分析,突出了污染源与受纳水水质之间的因果关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验