Suppr超能文献

经皮球囊扩张术联合自膨式金属支架治疗贲门失弛缓症:一项长期随访的前瞻性研究。

Temporary self-expanding metallic stents and pneumatic dilation for the treatment of achalasia: a prospective study with a long-term follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2010 Jul;23(5):361-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01048.x. Epub 2010 Mar 26.

Abstract

The present study compares the efficacy of a self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS, diameter of 30 mm) and pneumatic dilation for the long-term clinical treatment of achalasia. A total of 155 patients diagnosed with achalasia were allocated for pneumatic dilation (n= 80, group A) or a temporary, 30-mm diameter SEMS (n= 75, group B). The SEMSs were placed under fluoroscopic guidance and removed by gastroscopy 4-5 days after placement. Data on clinical symptoms, complications, and long-term clinical outcomes were collected, and follow-up observations were performed at 6 months and at 1, 3-5, 5-8, 8-10, and >10 years, postoperatively. Pneumatic dilation and stent placement were technically successful in all of the patients. There were no significant differences in technique success, 30-day mortality, or complications between the two groups. The clinical remission rate in group A was significantly lower than that in group B at 1, 1-3, 3-5, 5-8 and, >10 years (P < 0.05), while the cumulative clinical failure rate in group A (66%, 53/80) was higher than that in group B (92%, 6/75). The mean primary patency in group B was significantly longer than that in group A (4.2 vs 2.1 years, respectively; P < 0.001). A temporary, 30-mm diameter SEMS was associated with a better long-term clinical efficacy in the treatment of patients with achalasia as compared with treatment with pneumatic dilation.

摘要

本研究比较了自膨式金属支架(SEMS,直径 30mm)和气动扩张在治疗贲门失弛缓症的长期临床疗效。共有 155 名诊断为贲门失弛缓症的患者被分配接受气动扩张(n=80,A 组)或临时放置 30mm 直径的 SEMS(n=75,B 组)。SEMS 在透视引导下放置,并在放置后 4-5 天通过胃镜取出。收集了临床症状、并发症和长期临床结果的数据,并在术后 6 个月以及 1、3-5、5-8、8-10 和>10 年进行随访观察。所有患者的气动扩张和支架放置均技术成功。两组之间在技术成功率、30 天死亡率或并发症方面均无显著差异。A 组的临床缓解率在 1、1-3、3-5、5-8 和>10 年时显著低于 B 组(P<0.05),而 A 组的累积临床失败率(66%,53/80)高于 B 组(92%,6/75)。B 组的初次通畅平均时间明显长于 A 组(分别为 4.2 年和 2.1 年;P<0.001)。与气动扩张治疗相比,临时放置 30mm 直径的 SEMS 治疗贲门失弛缓症具有更好的长期临床疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验