Graduate Program in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
J Pain. 2010 Jul;11(7):681-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.10.013. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
UNLABELLED: Pain is a debilitating condition affecting millions each year, yet what predisposes certain individuals to be more sensitive to pain remains relatively unknown. Several psychological factors have been associated with pain perception, but the structural relations between multiple higher- and lower-order constructs and pain are not well understood. Thus, we aimed to examine the associations between pain perception using the cold pressor task (CPT), higher-order personality traits (neuroticism, negative affectivity, trait anxiety, extraversion, positive affectivity, psychoticism), and lower-order pain-related psychological constructs (pain catastrophizing [pre- and post-], fear of pain, anxiety sensitivity, somatosensory amplification, hypochondriasis) in 66 pain-free adults. Factor analysis revealed 3 latent psychological variables: pain- or body-sensitivity, negative affect/neuroticism, and positive affect/extraversion. Similarly, pain responses factored into 3 domains: intensity, quality, and tolerance. Regression and correlation analyses demonstrated that: 1) all the lower-order pain constructs (fear, catastrophizing, and hypochondriasis) are related through a single underlying latent factor that is partially related to the higher-order negative-valence personality traits; 2) pain- or body-sensitivity was more strongly predictive of pain quality than higher-order traits; and 3) the form of pain assessment is important-only qualitative pain ratings were significantly predicted by the psychological factors. PERSPECTIVE: Consistent with the biopsychosocial model, these results suggest multiple pain-related psychological measures likely assess a common underlying factor, which is more predictive of qualitative than intensity pain ratings. This information may be useful for the development and advancement of pain assessments and treatments while considering the multidimensional nature of pain.
未加标签:疼痛是一种每年影响数百万人的衰弱性疾病,但导致某些人对疼痛更敏感的原因仍相对未知。一些心理因素与疼痛感知有关,但多个高阶和低阶结构之间的结构关系以及疼痛尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在使用冷水压迫测试(CPT)检查疼痛感知与高阶人格特质(神经质,负性情感,特质焦虑,外向性,正性情感,精神病态)之间的关联,以及与疼痛相关的低阶心理结构(疼痛灾难化[前,后],对疼痛的恐惧,焦虑敏感性,躯体感觉放大,疑病症)在 66 名无痛成年人中。因子分析显示 3 个潜在的心理变量:疼痛或身体敏感性,负性情感/神经质和正性情感/外向性。同样,疼痛反应分为 3 个领域:强度,质量和耐受性。回归和相关分析表明:1)所有低阶疼痛结构(恐惧,灾难化和疑病症)都通过单个潜在的共同因素相关,该因素与高阶负价人格特质部分相关;2)疼痛或身体敏感性比高阶特质更能预测疼痛质量;3)疼痛评估的形式很重要-仅定性疼痛评分才受心理因素的显著预测。
观点:与生物心理社会模型一致,这些结果表明,多种与疼痛相关的心理测量可能评估了一个共同的潜在因素,该因素对定性疼痛评分的预测性强于强度疼痛评分。在考虑疼痛的多维性质时,此信息可能有助于疼痛评估和治疗的发展和进步。
Behav Res Ther. 2008-6
J Pain. 2010-6-2
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2011-12
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024-8-5
J Pain Res. 2021-6-17
Front Psychol. 2020-7-28
Front Psychol. 2020-2-21
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018-11
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966-4-1
J Neurosci. 2009-1-21
J Aging Health. 2006-2