Wang Dan, Merkle Shannon L, Lee Jennifer E, Sluka Kathleen A, Rakel Barbara, Graven-Nielsen Thomas, Frey-Law Laura A
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (USARIEM), Natick, MA, USA.
J Pain Res. 2020 Oct 7;13:2493-2508. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S267972. eCollection 2020.
Some individuals with chronic pain find daily life sensations (eg, noise, light, or touch) aversive. This amplification of multisensory sensations has been associated with centrally mediated plasticity; for example, greater multisensory sensitivity (MSS) occurs in patients with fibromyalgia than rheumatoid arthritis. However, whether MSS preferentially relates to pain measures which reflect central influences (eg, dynamic quantitative sensory testing (QST) or referred pain), or whether the MSS-pain relationship requires priming from chronic pain, is unknown. Thus, this cross-sectional study investigated the relationships between MSS assessed in a pain-free state and evoked pain sensitivity.
Experimental intramuscular infusion pain and multiple static and dynamic QST were assessed in 465 healthy, pain-free adults: pain thresholds using pressure (PPTs) and heat (HPTs), temporal summation of pain (TSP) using pressure, heat or punctate stimuli, and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) using pressure or heat test stimuli. MSS was assessed using 7 items from Barsky's Somatosensory Amplification Scale. Differences in pain and QST between sex-specific MSS quartiles were assessed, adjusting for multiple comparisons. All participants completed at least one intramuscular infusion condition, but not all were asked to complete each QST (n=166-465).
Both static and dynamic QST differed between highest and lowest MSS quartiles using pressure stimuli: lower PPTs (adjusted-p<0.01); increased pressure TSP (adjusted-p=0.02); lower pressure CPM (adjusted-p=0.01). However, none of the heat or punctate QST measures (HPTs, TSP, or CPM) differed between MSS quartiles (adjusted-p>0.05). Odds of experiencing TSP or referred pain was not greater, whereas CPM was 8-fold less likely, in those with highest MSS.
Normal variation in non-noxious MSS is related to both static and dynamic pain sensitivity, without sensitization associated with chronic pain, but is dependent on the QST stimulus. Thus, common influences on MSS and pain sensitivity may involve central mechanisms but are likely more complex than previously recognized.
一些慢性疼痛患者会觉得日常生活中的感觉(如噪音、光线或触摸)令人厌恶。这种多感官感觉的放大与中枢介导的可塑性有关;例如,纤维肌痛患者比类风湿性关节炎患者具有更高的多感官敏感性(MSS)。然而,MSS是否优先与反映中枢影响的疼痛测量指标相关(如动态定量感觉测试(QST)或牵涉痛),或者MSS与疼痛的关系是否需要慢性疼痛的激发,目前尚不清楚。因此,这项横断面研究调查了在无痛状态下评估的MSS与诱发疼痛敏感性之间的关系。
对465名健康的无痛成年人进行了实验性肌内注射疼痛和多项静态及动态QST评估:使用压力(PPTs)和热(HPTs)的疼痛阈值,使用压力、热或点状刺激的疼痛时间总和(TSP),以及使用压力或热测试刺激的条件性疼痛调制(CPM)。使用Barsky体感放大量表中的7个项目评估MSS。评估了按性别划分的MSS四分位数之间疼痛和QST的差异,并对多重比较进行了校正。所有参与者至少完成了一种肌内注射情况,但并非所有人都被要求完成每项QST(n = 166 - 465)。
使用压力刺激时,最高和最低MSS四分位数之间的静态和动态QST均存在差异:PPTs较低(校正后p < 0.01);压力TSP增加(校正后p = 0.02);压力CPM较低(校正后p = 0.01)。然而,MSS四分位数之间的热或点状QST测量指标(HPTs、TSP或CPM)均无差异(校正后p > 0.05)。MSS最高的人群中,经历TSP或牵涉痛的几率并不更高,而CPM的可能性则低8倍。
无害性MSS的正常变异与静态和动态疼痛敏感性均相关,且不存在与慢性疼痛相关的敏化,但这取决于QST刺激。因此,对MSS和疼痛敏感性的共同影响可能涉及中枢机制,但可能比之前认为的更为复杂。