Suppr超能文献

电动移动设备(轮椅)与机动车辆之间的交通碰撞:事故、傲慢还是自我毁灭行为?

Traffic collisions between electric mobility devices (wheelchairs) and motor vehicles: Accidents, hubris, or self-destructive behavior?

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, USA.

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jul;89(7):557-60. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181d8a346.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study had its genesis in a personally observed collision between a motor vehicle and a motorized wheelchair (electric mobility device) on a busy street in the middle of the block at an unmarked crossing. To the observer, at the time, this appeared to be a suicidal act. This investigation was initiated to both delineate the number of these crashes nationally and understand this phenomena as a potentially planned act of self-destruction.

DESIGN

An initial survey of police reports was immediately frustrated by an inability to separate motor vehicle and electric mobility device collisions from the much larger group that involved ambulatory citizens because both types were classified together as "pedestrian" accidents. Instead, the search engine NexisLexis was used to identify 107 newspaper articles each of which described a motor vehicle and electric mobility device accident.

RESULTS

In the motor vehicle and electric mobility device collisions, men predominated women (3:1 ratio) with an average age of 56 yrs. Sixty of these accidents were fatal. Ninety-four percent involved an electric mobility device and 6% a manual wheelchair. In 50% of the cases, the motor vehicle was a truck, van, or sport utility vehicle. Fifty percent occurred at dusk or dawn or at night. The electric mobility device occupant was cited as the guilty party in 39% of the cases and the driver of the motor vehicle in 27%. Twenty percent were unwitnessed hit-and-run accidents, whereas "no fault" was found in 8% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although many accidents do happen by chance, when an electric mobility device operator openly challenges busy traffic by attempting to traverse it in the middle of the block at an unmarked crossing, predisposing psychosocial factors must also be considered. Hubris or premeditated self-destructive behavior or both need to be explored as preeminent issues with reference to the prodromal of the "accident process."

摘要

目的

本研究起源于在街区中部的一条繁忙街道上,一辆机动车与电动轮椅(电动代步工具)在一个无标记的十字路口发生的碰撞。在当时的观察者看来,这似乎是一起自杀事件。发起这项调查是为了在全国范围内确定此类事故的数量,并将这种现象视为一种潜在的有计划的自我毁灭行为。

设计

最初,警方报告的调查立即受阻,因为无法将机动车与电动代步工具的碰撞事故与涉及步行市民的更大群体区分开来,因为这两种事故都被归类为“行人”事故。相反,使用搜索引擎 NexisLexis 来识别了 107 篇报纸文章,每篇文章都描述了一起机动车与电动代步工具事故。

结果

在机动车与电动代步工具的碰撞事故中,男性多于女性(比例为 3:1),平均年龄为 56 岁。其中 60 起事故是致命的。94%涉及电动代步工具,6%涉及手动轮椅。在 50%的情况下,肇事车辆为卡车、厢式货车或运动型多用途车。50%的事故发生在黄昏、黎明或夜间。在 39%的情况下,电动代步工具的使用者被认定为肇事方,而在 27%的情况下,机动车驾驶员被认定为肇事方。20%的事故为无人目击的肇事逃逸事故,而在 8%的情况下,事故被认定为无过错。

结论

尽管许多事故确实是偶然发生的,但当电动代步工具使用者公然挑战繁忙的交通,试图在无标记的十字路口穿过街区中部时,也必须考虑到潜在的社会心理因素。傲慢或蓄意的自我毁灭行为,或两者兼而有之,都需要作为“事故过程”的前驱问题进行探讨。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验