Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, College of Medicine, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.
Pathol Res Pract. 2010 Aug 15;206(8):544-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
The distinction between intraepithelial proliferations of ductal and lobular type is often straightforward. However, a small number of cases create diagnostic problems even for experienced pathologists. Among those is the recognized, but not always kept in mind, lobular neoplasia with "comedo-type" necrosis. Herein, we present six cases of lobular neoplasia with comedo necrosis. Three cases were classified correctly, whereas the three remaining cases were initially misdiagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ with necrosis. Of these three misdiagnosed cases, one patient underwent radiation therapy before this study was carried out. The two other patients were correctly reclassified as lobular type in subsequent excisional biopsies. One case showed a focus of microinvasion. All six lesions were negative by E-cadherin immunohistochemistry. Our experience highlights that the correct differentiation between intraepithelial neoplasias of ductal and lobular type may be challenging, and that the correct differentiation is extremely important for prognostic information and therapeutic decisions.
导管上皮内增生和小叶型上皮内增生的鉴别通常很直接。然而,一小部分病例即使是有经验的病理学家也会产生诊断问题。其中之一就是已经认识到但并非总是被记住的伴有“粉刺样”坏死的小叶肿瘤。在此,我们介绍了 6 例伴有粉刺样坏死的小叶肿瘤。其中 3 例被正确分类,而其余 3 例最初被误诊为伴有坏死的导管原位癌。在进行这项研究之前,这 3 例误诊病例中有 1 例接受了放射治疗。另外 2 例患者在后续的切除术活检中被正确地重新分类为小叶型。1 例显示有微小浸润灶。所有 6 例病变的 E-钙黏蛋白免疫组化均为阴性。我们的经验表明,正确区分导管内和小叶型上皮内肿瘤可能具有挑战性,正确区分对于预后信息和治疗决策至关重要。