Suppr超能文献

根据不同领域评估 NSAIDs/TNF 阻滞剂在强直性脊柱炎中的治疗效果:荟萃分析结果。

Evaluation of the treatment effect of NSAIDs/TNF blockers according to different domains in ankylosing spondylitis: results of a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Rheumatology B Department, APHP Cochin Hospital, René Descartes University, Paris, France.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Jul;49(7):1317-25. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq078. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the treatment effect of NSAIDs and TNF blockers in AS according to different domains of interest.

METHODS

A systematic literature research was performed in electronic databases up to October 2009. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy (on pain and/or physical function and/or acute-phase reactants) of NSAIDs/anti-TNF vs placebo in AS were selected. Pooled effect sizes were calculated by meta-analysis, using fixed or random-effect models.

RESULTS

Optimal data to calculate the effect size were available in 8 out of the 240 selected RCTs evaluating anti-TNF and 5 of the 135 evaluating NSAIDs. For the domains pain, physical function and patient's global assessment, the treatment effect was large or medium for both TNF blockers and NSAIDs. For the domain acute-phase reactants, the effect of TNF blockers was medium [standardized mean difference (SMD) (95% CI) -0.56 (-0.70, -0.42)], whereas NSAIDs had no significant effect on acute-phase reactants {SMD [95% odds ratio (OR)] -0.09 (-0.34, 0.16)}. Finally for the domain mobility, the effect of both TNF blockers and NSAIDs was small and not significant.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the treatment effect of NSAIDs and anti-TNF are both of relevant magnitude considering the main patient-reported outcomes but with a trend in favour of anti-TNF despite the fact that such drugs are given on top of NSAIDs in refractory patients. Moreover, a statistically significant difference was observed for the domain 'acute-phase reactants' confirming the specificity of such drug category.

摘要

目的

根据不同的研究领域,评估 NSAIDs 和 TNF 拮抗剂治疗 AS 的疗效。

方法

系统检索电子数据库至 2009 年 10 月,纳入所有报道 NSAIDs/抗 TNF 与安慰剂治疗 AS 的疗效(包括疼痛和/或躯体功能和/或急性期反应物)的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用固定或随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,计算合并效应量。

结果

在评估抗 TNF 的 240 项 RCT 和评估 NSAIDs 的 135 项 RCT 中,分别有 8 项和 5 项提供了计算效应量的最佳数据。在疼痛、躯体功能和患者总体评估领域,TNF 拮抗剂和 NSAIDs 的治疗效果均为大或中。在急性期反应物领域,TNF 拮抗剂的疗效为中(标准化均数差(SMD)(95%CI)-0.56(-0.70,-0.42)),而 NSAIDs 对急性期反应物无显著影响[SMD(95%OR)-0.09(-0.34,0.16)]。最后,在躯体运动领域,TNF 拮抗剂和 NSAIDs 的疗效均较小且无统计学意义。

结论

本研究表明,考虑到主要的患者报告结局,NSAIDs 和抗 TNF 的治疗效果均具有重要意义,但倾向于抗 TNF,尽管此类药物在难治性患者中是在 NSAIDs 的基础上加用的。此外,在“急性期反应物”领域观察到统计学显著差异,证实了此类药物类别的特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验