Langohr G Daniel G, Giles Joshua W, Athwal George S, Johnson James A
Biomechanics Laboratory, Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Biomechanics Laboratory, Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jun;24(6):972-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
Little is known about the effects of glenosphere diameter on shoulder joint loads. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to investigate the effects of glenosphere diameter on joint load, load angle, and total deltoid force required for active abduction and range of motion in internal/external rotation and abduction.
A custom, instrumented reverse shoulder arthroplasty implant system capable of measuring joint load and varying glenosphere diameter (38 and 42 mm) and glenoid offset (neutral and lateral) was implanted in 6 cadaveric shoulders to provide at least 80% power for all variables. A shoulder motion simulator was used to produce active glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motion. All implant configurations were tested with active and passive motion with joint kinematics, loads, and moments recorded.
At neutral and lateralized glenosphere positions, increasing diameter significantly increased joint load (+12 ± 21 N and +6 ± 9 N; P < .01) and deltoid load required for active abduction (+9 ± 22 N and +11 ± 15 N; P < .02), whereas joint load angle was unaffected (P > .8). Passive internal rotation was reduced with increased diameter at both neutral and lateralized glenosphere positions (-6° ± 6° and -12° ± 6°; P < .002); however, external rotation was not affected (P > .05). At neutral glenosphere position, increasing diameter increased the maximum angles of both adduction (+1° ± 1°; P = .03) and abduction (+8° ± 9°; P < .05). Lateralization also increased abduction range of motion compared with neutral (P < .01).
Although increasing glenosphere diameter significantly increased joint load and deltoid force, the clinical impact of these changes is presently unclear. Internal rotation, however, was reduced, which contradicts previous bone modeling studies, which we postulate is due to increased posterior capsular tension as it is forced to wrap around a larger 42 mm implant assembly.
关于球盂直径对肩关节负荷的影响,目前所知甚少。本生物力学研究的目的是探讨球盂直径对关节负荷、负荷角度以及主动外展和内/外旋转及外展活动范围所需三角肌总力量的影响。
将一种能够测量关节负荷并可改变球盂直径(38毫米和42毫米)及关节盂偏移(中立位和外侧位)的定制、带有仪器的反向肩关节置换植入系统植入6具尸体肩部,以确保所有变量的检验效能至少达到80%。使用肩部运动模拟器产生主动盂肱关节和肩胛胸壁关节运动。所有植入配置均在主动和被动运动状态下进行测试,记录关节运动学、负荷和力矩。
在球盂中立位和外侧位时,增大直径显著增加关节负荷(分别增加12±21牛和6±9牛;P<.01)以及主动外展所需三角肌负荷(分别增加9±22牛和11±15牛;P<.02),而关节负荷角度未受影响(P>.8)。在球盂中立位和外侧位时,随着直径增大,被动内旋均减小(分别减小6°±6°和12°±6°;P<.002);然而,外旋未受影响(P>.05)。在球盂中立位时,增大直径增加了内收(增加1°±1°;P=.03)和外展(增加8°±9°;P<.05)的最大角度。与中立位相比,外侧位也增加了外展活动范围(P<.01)。
尽管增大球盂直径显著增加关节负荷和三角肌力量,但这些变化的临床影响目前尚不清楚。然而,内旋减小,这与之前的骨建模研究结果相矛盾,我们推测这是由于后关节囊被迫包裹更大的42毫米植入组件而导致后关节囊张力增加所致。