Suppr超能文献

氯吡格雷负荷治疗在慢性氯吡格雷治疗行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的应用:ARMYDA-4 RELOAD(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中抗血小板治疗减少心肌损伤)随机试验结果。

Clopidogrel reloading in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention on chronic clopidogrel therapy: results of the ARMYDA-4 RELOAD (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2010 Jun;31(11):1337-43. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq081. Epub 2010 Apr 2.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate safety and effectiveness of clopidogrel reloading in patients on chronic clopidogrel therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Five hundred and three patients on >10 days clopidogrel therapy (41% with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, ACS) randomly received 600 mg clopidogrel loading 4-8 h before PCI (n = 252) or placebo (n = 251). Primary endpoint was 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). In the overall population primary endpoint occurred in 6.7% of patients in the reload vs. 8.8% in the placebo arm [odds ratios (OR) 0.75, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.37-1.52; P = 0.50]. In stable angina patients, 1-month MACE were not significantly different (7.0 vs. 3.9%; OR 1.84, 0.60-5.88; P = 0.36), whereas ACS patients had significant clinical benefit with reloading (6.4 vs. 16.3%; OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.32-0.90, P = 0.033 at multivariable analysis; interaction test: P = 0.01). There was no excess bleeding in the reload arm (6% in both groups).

CONCLUSION

ARMYDA-4 RELOAD reveals no overall benefit from reloading patients on chronic clopidogrel therapy prior to PCI; the benefit observed in ACS patients is a hypothesis-generating finding that needs to be confirmed by larger studies.

摘要

目的

评估接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的慢性氯吡格雷治疗患者中氯吡格雷再负荷的安全性和有效性。

方法和结果

503 例接受>10 天氯吡格雷治疗的患者(41%为非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征,ACS)随机接受 600mg 氯吡格雷负荷量,在 PCI 前 4-8 小时(n=252)或安慰剂(n=251)。主要终点为 30 天主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率。在总体人群中,负荷组和安慰剂组的主要终点发生率分别为 6.7%和 8.8%[比值比(OR)0.75,95%置信区间(CI)0.37-1.52;P=0.50]。在稳定型心绞痛患者中,1 个月 MACE 无显著差异(7.0% vs. 3.9%;OR 1.84,0.60-5.88;P=0.36),而 ACS 患者再负荷治疗有显著临床获益(6.4% vs. 16.3%;OR 0.34,95%CI 0.32-0.90,P=0.033 在多变量分析中;交互检验:P=0.01)。负荷组无出血增加(两组均为 6%)。

结论

ARMYDA-4 RELOAD 研究未显示在 PCI 前对慢性氯吡格雷治疗患者进行再负荷有总体获益;在 ACS 患者中观察到的获益是一个需要更大研究证实的假设产生的发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验