Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Eur Heart J. 2010 Jun;31(11):1337-43. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq081. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
To evaluate safety and effectiveness of clopidogrel reloading in patients on chronic clopidogrel therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Five hundred and three patients on >10 days clopidogrel therapy (41% with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, ACS) randomly received 600 mg clopidogrel loading 4-8 h before PCI (n = 252) or placebo (n = 251). Primary endpoint was 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). In the overall population primary endpoint occurred in 6.7% of patients in the reload vs. 8.8% in the placebo arm [odds ratios (OR) 0.75, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.37-1.52; P = 0.50]. In stable angina patients, 1-month MACE were not significantly different (7.0 vs. 3.9%; OR 1.84, 0.60-5.88; P = 0.36), whereas ACS patients had significant clinical benefit with reloading (6.4 vs. 16.3%; OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.32-0.90, P = 0.033 at multivariable analysis; interaction test: P = 0.01). There was no excess bleeding in the reload arm (6% in both groups).
ARMYDA-4 RELOAD reveals no overall benefit from reloading patients on chronic clopidogrel therapy prior to PCI; the benefit observed in ACS patients is a hypothesis-generating finding that needs to be confirmed by larger studies.
评估接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的慢性氯吡格雷治疗患者中氯吡格雷再负荷的安全性和有效性。
503 例接受>10 天氯吡格雷治疗的患者(41%为非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征,ACS)随机接受 600mg 氯吡格雷负荷量,在 PCI 前 4-8 小时(n=252)或安慰剂(n=251)。主要终点为 30 天主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率。在总体人群中,负荷组和安慰剂组的主要终点发生率分别为 6.7%和 8.8%[比值比(OR)0.75,95%置信区间(CI)0.37-1.52;P=0.50]。在稳定型心绞痛患者中,1 个月 MACE 无显著差异(7.0% vs. 3.9%;OR 1.84,0.60-5.88;P=0.36),而 ACS 患者再负荷治疗有显著临床获益(6.4% vs. 16.3%;OR 0.34,95%CI 0.32-0.90,P=0.033 在多变量分析中;交互检验:P=0.01)。负荷组无出血增加(两组均为 6%)。
ARMYDA-4 RELOAD 研究未显示在 PCI 前对慢性氯吡格雷治疗患者进行再负荷有总体获益;在 ACS 患者中观察到的获益是一个需要更大研究证实的假设产生的发现。