Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 15;57(7):771-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.050.
This study was done to compare effects of high versus standard clopidogrel maintenance doses on platelet inhibition, inflammation, and endothelial function in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Previous data suggested that clopidogrel has various biological actions in addition to antiplatelet effects.
Fifty patients were randomly assigned 1 month after intervention (T-0) to receive standard (75 mg/day; n = 25) or high (150 mg/day; n = 25) clopidogrel maintenance dose for 30 days (until T-1); at this time-point, cross-over was performed, and the assigned clopidogrel maintenance regimen was switched and continued for a further 30 days (until T-2). Platelet reactivity (expressed as P2Y(12) reaction units by the point-of-care VerifyNow assay [Accumetrics, San Diego, California]), endothelial function (evaluated by flow-mediated vasodilation), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were measured at T-0, T-1, and T-2.
Patients in the 150-mg/day arm had higher platelet inhibition (50 ± 20% vs. 31 ± 20% in the 75-mg/day group; p < 0.0001), better flow-mediated vasodilation (16.9 ± 12.6% vs. 7.9 ± 7.5%; p = 0.0001), and lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (3.6 ± 3.0 mg/l vs. 7.0 ± 8.6 mg/l; p = 0.016). Higher clopidogrel dose was associated with decreased proportion of patients with P2Y(12) reaction units ≥ 240 (12% vs. 32%; p = 0.001), flow-mediated vasodilation <7% (16% vs. 58%; p = 0.0003), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels >3 mg/l (46% vs. 64%; p = 0.07).
For patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the 150-mg/day clopidogrel maintenance dose is associated with stronger platelet inhibition, improvement of endothelial function, and reduction of inflammation, compared with the currently recommended 75-mg/day regimen; those effects might have a role in the clinical benefit observed with clopidogrel and may provide the rationale for using the higher maintenance regimen in selected patients.
本研究旨在比较高剂量与标准剂量氯吡格雷维持治疗对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者血小板抑制、炎症和内皮功能的影响。
先前的数据表明,氯吡格雷除了具有抗血小板作用外,还有各种生物学作用。
50 例患者在介入治疗后 1 个月(T-0)随机分为标准剂量(75mg/天;n=25)或高剂量(150mg/天;n=25)氯吡格雷维持治疗组,治疗 30 天(至 T-1);此时进行交叉,切换分配的氯吡格雷维持方案,并继续治疗 30 天(至 T-2)。在 T-0、T-1 和 T-2 时,通过即时检测 VerifyNow 测定仪(Accumetrics,圣地亚哥,加利福尼亚州)测定血小板反应性(以 P2Y(12)反应单位表示)、内皮功能(通过血流介导的血管扩张评估)和高敏 C 反应蛋白水平。
150mg/天组的血小板抑制作用更强(50±20% vs. 75mg/天组 31±20%;p<0.0001),血流介导的血管扩张更好(16.9±12.6% vs. 7.9±7.5%;p=0.0001),高敏 C 反应蛋白水平更低(3.6±3.0mg/l vs. 7.0±8.6mg/l;p=0.016)。较高的氯吡格雷剂量与 P2Y(12)反应单位≥240 的患者比例降低(12% vs. 32%;p=0.001)、血流介导的血管扩张<7%(16% vs. 58%;p=0.0003)和高敏 C 反应蛋白水平>3mg/l(46% vs. 64%;p=0.07)的患者比例降低有关。
与目前推荐的 75mg/天方案相比,对于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,氯吡格雷 150mg/天维持剂量与更强的血小板抑制、内皮功能改善和炎症减少相关;这些作用可能在氯吡格雷的临床获益中发挥作用,并为在某些患者中使用更高的维持剂量提供了依据。